Submission scientific data

This commit is contained in:
Orihara Izaya
2025-12-15 13:47:28 +01:00
commit b53e63f57e
107 changed files with 8464 additions and 0 deletions
+51
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
questionnaire: "agency"
scales:
- name: "agency_favorite_ai"
label: "Perceived Agency of Favorite AI system"
items:
- id: "agency_User_fav_1"
text: "(piped fav AI) can create new goals."
inverse: false
- id: "agency_User_fav_2"
text: "(piped fav AI) can communicate with people."
inverse: false
- id: "agency_User_fav_3"
text: "(piped fav AI) can show emotions to other people."
inverse: false
- id: "agency_User_fav_4"
text: "(piped fav AI) can change their behavior based on how people treat them."
inverse: false
- id: "agency_User_fav_5"
text: "(piped fav AI) can adapt to different situations."
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 5]
format: "Likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = Strongly disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly agree"
output: "agency_favorite_ai"
reference: "self"
- name: "agency_no_user"
label: "Perceived Agency of AI in General"
items:
- id: "agency_noUser_1"
text: "AI can create new goals."
inverse: false
- id: "agency_noUser_2"
text: "AI can communicate with people."
inverse: false
- id: "agency_noUser_3"
text: "AI can show emotions to other people."
inverse: false
- id: "agency_noUser_4"
text: "AI can change their behavior based on how people treat them."
inverse: false
- id: "agency_noUser_5"
text: "AI can adapt to different situations."
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 5]
format: "Likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = Strongly disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly agree"
output: "agency_ai_no_user"
reference: "self"
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
questionnaire: "ai_adoption_factors_open_question"
scales:
- name: "ai_adoption_factors_open_question"
label: "Changes needed for AI adoption"
items:
- id: "wht_need_chnge_noUser"
text: "What would need to change for you to change your opinion and start using AI-based services on a regular basis?"
format: "response"
calculation: "response"
output: "ai_adoption_factors_open_question"
reference: "self"
+23
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
questionnaire: "ai_aversion"
scales:
- name: "ai_aversion_no_user"
label: "Aversion Toward AI Among Non-Users"
items:
- id: "AI_aversion_noUser_1"
text: "I feel uneasy when I think about integrating AI systems into my daily activities."
inverse: false
- id: "AI_aversion_noUser_2"
text: "I believe that the benefits of AI are exaggerated by technology companies."
inverse: false
- id: "AI_aversion_noUser_3"
text: "I prefer relying on human judgment rather than on AI-driven processes."
inverse: false
- id: "AI_aversion_noUser_4"
text: "I find the general hype surrounding AI to be excessive."
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 7]
format: "Likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = Strongly disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Somewhat disagree, 4 = Neither disagree nor agree, 5 = Somewhat agree, 6 = Agree, 7 = Strongly agree"
output: "ai_aversion_no_user"
reference: "self"
+13
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
questionnaire: "apple_use"
scales:
- name: "apple_use"
label: "Current Use of Apple Device"
items:
- id: "apple_use"
text: "Do you currently use an Apple device?"
calculation: "categorical"
response_options:
"1": "Yes"
"2": "No"
output: "apple_use"
reference: "self"
+47
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
questionnaire: "attitudes"
scales:
- name: "attitudes"
label: "Attitudes toward AI in general (ATTARI-12)"
items:
- id: "attitudes_1"
text: "AI will make this world a better place."
inverse: false
- id: "attitudes_2"
text: "I have strong negative emotions about AI."
inverse: true
- id: "attitudes_3"
text: "I want to use technologies that rely on AI."
inverse: false
- id: "attitudes_4"
text: "AI has more disadvantages than advantages."
inverse: true
- id: "attitudes_5"
text: "I look forward to future AI developments."
inverse: false
- id: "attitudes_6"
text: "AI offers solutions to many world problems."
inverse: false
- id: "attitudes_7"
text: "I prefer technologies that do not feature AI."
inverse: true
- id: "attitudes_8"
text: "I am afraid of AI."
inverse: true
- id: "attitudes_9"
text: "I would rather choose a technology with AI than one without it."
inverse: false
- id: "attitudes_10"
text: "AI creates problems rather than solving them."
inverse: true
- id: "attitudes_11"
text: "When I think about AI, I have mostly positive feelings."
inverse: false
- id: "attitudes_12"
text: "I would rather avoid technologies that are based on AI."
inverse: true
score_range: [1, 5]
format: "Likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree"
output: "attitudes"
reference: "Stein et al., 2024"
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
questionnaire: "attitudes_toward_ai_decisions"
scales:
- name: "attitudes_toward_ai_decisions"
label: "Attitudes Toward AI in Decision-Making"
items:
- id: "dec_mkng_1"
text: "If given the opportunity, I would let an AI system make most of my decisions."
inverse: false
- id: "dec_mkng_2"
text: "I think AI systems will eventually make better decisions than humans in most areas."
inverse: false
- id: "dec_mkng_3"
text: "I would feel relieved if AI systems could take over decision-making responsibilities in my life."
inverse: false
- id: "dec_mkng_4"
text: "I would be willing to let an AI system learn my preferences over time to make better decisions for me."
inverse: false
- id: "dec_mkng_5"
text: "In case I cannot, I would trust an AI system to make important financial decisions on my behalf."
inverse: false
- id: "dec_mkng_6"
text: "In case I cannot, I would trust an AI system to make important medical decisions on my behalf."
inverse: false
- id: "dec_mkng_7"
text: "In case I cannot, I would trust an AI system to make important legal decisions on my behalf."
inverse: false
- id: "dec_mkng_8"
text: "I would prefer to delegate routine decision-making tasks to an AI system."
inverse: false
- id: "dec_mkng_9"
text: "Using AI to make decisions saves me time and effort."
inverse: false
- id: "dec_mkng_10"
text: "I am comfortable letting AI systems choose the best options for me in daily life (e.g., what to buy, where to eat)."
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 5]
format: "Likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = Strongly disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neither disagree nor agree, 4 = Somewhat agree, 5 = Strongly agree"
output: "attitudes_toward_ai_decisions"
reference: "self"
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
questionnaire: "attitudes_toward_disclosure"
scales:
- name: "attitudes_toward_disclosure"
label: "Attitudes Toward AI Data Disclosure and Privacy"
items:
- id: "disclosure_1"
text: "I feel that AI practices are an invasion of privacy."
inverse: false
- id: "disclosure_2"
text: "I feel uncomfortable about the types of information that AI collects."
inverse: false
- id: "disclosure_3"
text: "The way that AI monitors its users makes me feel uneasy."
inverse: false
- id: "disclosure_4"
text: "I feel personally invaded by the methods used by AI to collect information."
inverse: false
- id: "disclosure_5"
text: "I am concerned about my privacy when using AI."
inverse: false
- id: "disclosure_6"
text: "I would find it acceptable if AI records and uses information about my usage behavior."
inverse: true
- id: "disclosure_7"
text: "I would provide AI access to information about me that is stored in or collected by other technological applications or systems."
inverse: true
- id: "disclosure_8"
text: "I would provide a lot of information to AI about things that represent me personally."
inverse: true
- id: "disclosure_9"
text: "I would find it acceptable if AI had a detailed profile of my person."
inverse: true
- id: "disclosure_10"
text: "I would give AI access to a lot of information that would characterize me as a person."
inverse: true
score_range: [1, 7]
format: "Likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = Strongly disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Somewhat disagree, 4 = Neutral, 5 = Somewhat agree, 6 = Agree, 7 = Strongly agree"
output: "attitudes_toward_disclosure"
reference: "Gieselmann, M., & Sassenberg, K. (2023); https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393221142787"
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
questionnaire: "attitudes_usage"
scales:
- name: "attitudes_usage"
label: "Attitude toward usage (UT scale)"
items:
- id: "attitudes_usage_1"
text: "I would rather avoid technologies that are based on AI."
inverse: true
- id: "attitudes_usage_2"
text: "AI makes work more interesting."
inverse: false
- id: "attitudes_usage_3"
text: "Working with AI is fun."
inverse: false
- id: "attitudes_usage_4"
text: "I like working with AI."
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 5]
format: "Likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = absolutely disagree, 5 = absolutely agree"
output: "attitudes_usage"
reference: "Venkatesh et al., 2009"
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
questionnaire: "barrier_for_use"
scales:
- name: "barrier_for_use"
label: "Barriers to Using AI More Frequently"
items:
- id: "barrier_1"
text: "I avoid AI because I worry about errors."
inverse: false
- id: "barrier_2"
text: "I avoid AI because it feels too complicated."
inverse: false
- id: "barrier_3"
text: "I avoid AI because I dont trust it."
inverse: false
- id: "barrier_4"
text: "I avoid AI because I fear it will replace my skills."
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 5]
format: "Likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = Strongly disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly agree"
output: "barrier_for_use"
reference: "self"
+112
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,112 @@
questionnaire: "bigfive"
scales:
- name: "bigfive_extraversion"
label: "Big Five Extraversion"
items:
- id: "bigfive_1"
text: "I am talkative"
inverse: false
- id: "bigfive_2"
text: "I have a tendency to be quiet"
inverse: true
- id: "bigfive_3"
text: "I can be shy and inhibited"
inverse: true
- id: "bigfive_4"
text: "I am outgoing and social"
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 5]
format: "Likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = disagree, 2 = slightly disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = slightly agree, 5 = agree"
output: "bigfive_extraversion"
reference: "Veloso Gouveia et al, 2021"
- name: "bigfive_agreeableness"
label: "Big Five Agreeableness"
items:
- id: "bigfive_5"
text: "I am helpful and selfless towards others"
inverse: false
- id: "bigfive_6"
text: "I can be cold and distant"
inverse: true
- id: "bigfive_7"
text: "I am considerate towards most people"
inverse: false
- id: "bigfive_8"
text: "I can be impolite sometimes"
inverse: true
score_range: [1, 5]
format: "Likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = disagree, 2 = slightly disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = slightly agree, 5 = agree"
output: "bigfive_agreeableness"
reference: "Veloso Gouveia et al, 2021"
- name: "bigfive_conscientiousness"
label: "Big Five Conscientiousness"
items:
- id: "bigfive_9"
text: "I work thoroughly"
inverse: false
- id: "bigfive_10"
text: "I can be careless"
inverse: true
- id: "bigfive_11"
text: "I have a tendency to have little order in my life"
inverse: true
- id: "bigfive_12"
text: "I make plans and follow through"
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 5]
format: "Likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = disagree, 2 = slightly disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = slightly agree, 5 = agree"
output: "bigfive_conscientiousness"
reference: "Veloso Gouveia et al, 2021"
- name: "bigfive_neuroticism"
label: "Big Five Neuroticism"
items:
- id: "bigfive_13"
text: "I am depressed"
inverse: false
- id: "bigfive_14"
text: "I am relaxed, manage stress well"
inverse: true
- id: "bigfive_15"
text: "I worry a lot"
inverse: false
- id: "bigfive_16"
text: "I easily get nervous"
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 5]
format: "Likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = disagree, 2 = slightly disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = slightly agree, 5 = agree"
output: "bigfive_neuroticism"
reference: "Veloso Gouveia et al, 2021"
- name: "bigfive_openness"
label: "Big Five Openness"
items:
- id: "bigfive_17"
text: "I am original, have new ideas"
inverse: false
- id: "bigfive_18"
text: "I have a vivid imagination"
inverse: false
- id: "bigfive_19"
text: "I like to speculate, play with ideas"
inverse: false
- id: "bigfive_20"
text: "I have few artistic interests"
inverse: true
score_range: [1, 5]
format: "Likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = disagree, 2 = slightly disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = slightly agree, 5 = agree"
output: "bigfive_openness"
reference: "Veloso Gouveia et al, 2021"
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
questionnaire: "change_in_writing_without_ai"
scales:
- name: "change_in_writing_without_ai"
label: "Change in Time Spent Writing Without AI"
items:
- id: "chng_wrtg_delg"
text: "Over the past year, has the amount of time you spend writing without AI increased, decreased, or stayed the same?"
calculation: "ordinal"
response_options:
"1": "Decreased"
"2": "Stayed the same"
"3": "Increased"
output: "change_in_writing_without_ai"
reference: "self"
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
questionnaire: "change_of_personal_role"
scales:
- name: "change_of_personal_role"
label: "Perceived Personal Role and Adaptation to AI"
items:
- id: "personalrole_1"
text: "I believe AI will change my role in society."
inverse: false
- id: "personalrole_2"
text: "I think I can use AI to improve my work or life."
inverse: false
- id: "personalrole_3"
text: "I feel powerless to influence how AI affects me."
inverse: false
- id: "personalrole_4"
text: "I expect to adapt my skills because of AI."
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 5]
format: "Likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = Strongly disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly agree"
output: "change_of_personal_role"
reference: "self"
+21
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
questionnaire: "closeness"
scales:
- name: "closeness_favorite_ai"
label: "Perceived Closeness to Favorite AI"
items:
- id: "closeness_User_fav"
text: "Please select the image that best represents how you perceive the relation you have with (piped fav AI)."
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 7]
format: "Image Selection"
calculation: "categorical"
response_options:
"1": "no_overlap"
"2": "slight_overlap"
"3": "some_overlap"
"4": "moderate_overlap"
"5": "strong_overlap"
"6": "very_strong_overlap"
"7": "almost_complete_overlap"
output: "closeness_favorite_ai"
reference: "Aron et al. (1992); https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596"
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
questionnaire: "cognitive selfesteem"
scales:
- name: "cognitive_selfesteem_thinking"
label: "cognitive selfesteem thinking"
items:
- id: "self_esteem_1"
text: "I am smart"
inverse: false
- id: "self_esteem_2"
text: "I am smarter than the average person"
inverse: false
- id: "self_esteem_3"
text: "My mind is one of my best qualities"
inverse: false
- id: "self_esteem_4"
text: "I am good at thinking"
inverse: false
- id: "self_esteem_5"
text: "I feel good about my ability to think through problems"
inverse: false
- id: "self_esteem_6"
text: "I am capable of solving most problems without outside help"
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 7]
format: "likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = strongly disagree, 7 = strongly agree"
output: "cognitive_selfesteem_thinking"
reference: "Ward (2013)"
- name: "cognitive_selfesteem_memory"
label: "cognitive_selfesteem memory"
items:
- id: "self_esteem_7"
text: "I am proud of my memory"
inverse: false
- id: "self_esteem_8"
text: "I feel good about my ability to remember things"
inverse: false
- id: "self_esteem_9"
text: "I have a better memory than most people"
inverse: false
- id: "self_esteem_10"
text: "I have a good memory for recalling trivial information"
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 7]
format: "likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = strongly disagree, 7 = strongly agree"
output: "cognitive_selfesteem_memory"
reference: "Ward (2013)"
- name: "cognitive_selfesteem_transactive_memory"
label: "cognitive selfesteem transactive memory"
items:
- id: "self_esteem_11"
text: "I know where to look to answer questions I don't know myself"
inverse: false
- id: "self_esteem_12"
text: "When I don't know the answer to a question right away, I know where to find it"
inverse: false
- id: "self_esteem_13"
text: "I know which people to ask when I don't know the answer to a question"
inverse: false
- id: "self_esteem_14"
text: "I have a knack for tracking down information"
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 7]
format: "likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = strongly disagree, 7 = strongly agree"
output: "cognitive_selfesteem_transactive_memory"
reference: "Ward (2013)"
+41
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
questionnaire: "companionship"
scales:
- name: "companionship_favorite_ai"
label: "Perceived Companionship with Favorite AI"
items:
- id: "companionship_User_fav_1"
text: "During my interactions with (piped fav AI), I spend enjoyable time."
inverse: false
- id: "companionship_User_fav_2"
text: "I feel included when I interact with (piped fav AI)."
inverse: false
- id: "companionship_User_fav_3"
text: "When I interact with (piped fav AI), it connects with me with things I like."
inverse: false
- id: "companionship_User_fav_4"
text: "I share activities with (piped fav AI) for fun."
inverse: false
- id: "companionship_User_fav_5"
text: "I have fun when interacting with (piped fav AI)."
inverse: false
- id: "companionship_User_fav_6"
text: "(piped fav AI) does things with me that I enjoy."
inverse: false
- id: "companionship_User_fav_7"
text: "I spend leisure time interacting with (piped fav AI)."
inverse: false
- id: "companionship_User_fav_8"
text: "I do things together with (piped fav AI) that I like."
inverse: false
- id: "companionship_User_fav_9"
text: "I participate in activities with (piped fav AI) that make me feel included."
inverse: false
- id: "companionship_User_fav_10"
text: "I spend time with (piped fav AI) in ways that make me feel I belong."
inverse: false
score_range: [0, 4]
format: "Likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "0 = Never, 1 = Rarely, 2 = Sometimes, 3 = Pretty often, 4 = A lot"
output: "companionship_favorite_ai"
reference: "self"
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
questionnaire: "concerns_about_loss_of_autonomy"
scales:
- name: "concerns_about_loss_of_autonomy_no_user"
label: "Concerns About Loss of Autonomy Due to AI Among Non-Users"
items:
- id: "loss_auto_noUser_1"
text: "I feel that using AI reduces my control over important decisions."
inverse: false
- id: "loss_auto_noUser_2"
text: "I am uncomfortable with machines making choices that affect my daily life."
inverse: false
- id: "loss_auto_noUser_3"
text: "I worry that AI could reduce my ability to act independently."
inverse: false
- id: "loss_auto_noUser_4"
text: "I believe that AI-driven automation could erode personal autonomy over time."
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 7]
format: "Likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = Strongly disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Somewhat disagree, 4 = Neither disagree nor agree, 5 = Somewhat agree, 6 = Agree, 7 = Strongly agree"
output: "concerns_about_loss_of_autonomy_no_user"
reference: "self"
@@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
questionnaire: "consequences_ai_use"
scales:
- name: "consequences_ai_use_user"
label: "Users' perceived consequences of AI use"
items:
- id: "conseq1_User_1"
text: "personal development"
inverse: false
- id: "conseq1_User_2"
text: "wellbeing"
inverse: false
- id: "conseq1_User_3"
text: "personality"
inverse: false
- id: "conseq1_User_4"
text: "friendships"
inverse: false
- id: "conseq1_User_5"
text: "interactions with strangers"
inverse: false
- id: "conseq1_User_6"
text: "interactions with family and friends"
inverse: false
- id: "conseq1_User_7"
text: "relationships with family and friends"
inverse: false
- id: "conseq2_User_1"
text: "feelings toward other people"
inverse: false
- id: "conseq2_User_2"
text: "patience with other people"
inverse: false
- id: "conseq2_User_3"
text: "politeness toward other people"
inverse: false
- id: "conseq2_User_4"
text: "collaboration with colleages"
inverse: false
- id: "conseq2_User_5"
text: "communication skills"
inverse: false
- id: "conseq2_User_6"
text: "problem-solving skills"
inverse: false
- id: "conseq2_User_7"
text: "other skills"
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 7]
format: "likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = Very harmful, 7 = Very helpful"
output: "consequences_ai_use_user"
reference: "Guingrich & Graziano (2024), self"
retain_single_items: true
- name: "consequences_ai_use_no_user"
label: "Non-users' perceived consequences of AI use"
items:
- id: "conseq1_noUser_1"
text: "personal development"
inverse: false
- id: "conseq1_noUser_2"
text: "wellbeing"
inverse: false
- id: "conseq1_noUser_3"
text: "personality"
inverse: false
- id: "conseq1_noUser_4"
text: "friendships"
inverse: false
- id: "conseq1_noUser_5"
text: "interactions with strangers"
inverse: false
- id: "conseq1_noUser_6"
text: "interactions with family and friends"
inverse: false
- id: "conseq1_noUser_7"
text: "relationships with family and friends"
inverse: false
- id: "conseq2_noUser_1"
text: "feelings toward other people"
inverse: false
- id: "conseq2_noUser_2"
text: "patience with other people"
inverse: false
- id: "conseq2_noUser_3"
text: "politeness toward other people"
inverse: false
- id: "conseq2_noUser_4"
text: "collaboration with colleages"
inverse: false
- id: "conseq2_noUser_5"
text: "communication skills"
inverse: false
- id: "conseq2_noUser_6"
text: "problem-solving skills"
inverse: false
- id: "conseq2_noUser_7"
text: "other skills"
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 7]
format: "likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = Very harmful, 7 = Very helpful"
output: "consequences_ai_use_no_user"
reference: "Guingrich & Graziano (2024), self"
retain_single_items: true
+25
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
questionnaire: "context_of_use"
scales:
- name: "context_of_use_user"
label: "Primary Context of Personal AI Usage"
items:
- id: "contxt"
text: "In which context do you use AI systems primarily?"
calculation: "categorical"
response_options:
"1": "Personal context"
"2": "Professional context"
output: "context_of_use_user"
reference: "self"
- name: "context_of_use_no_user"
label: "Primary Context of AI System Usage"
items:
- id: "contxt_noUser"
text: "In which context do you see AI systems primarily used?"
calculation: "categorical"
response_options:
"1": "Personal context"
"2": "Professional context"
output: "context_of_use_no_user"
reference: "self"
+52
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
questionnaire: "credibility"
scales:
- name: "credibility_favorite_ai"
label: "Perceived credibility of favorite AI system"
items:
- id: "credibility_User_fav_1"
text: "unbelievable - believable"
inverse: false
- id: "credibility_User_fav_2"
text: "inaccurate - accurate"
inverse: false
- id: "credibility_User_fav_3"
text: "untrustworthy - trustworthy"
inverse: false
- id: "credibility_User_fav_4"
text: "biased - unbiased"
inverse: false
- id: "credibility_User_fav_5"
text: "not credible - credible"
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 5]
format: "bipolar"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = agree with left option, 5 = agree with right option"
output: "credibility_favorite_ai"
reference: "Flanagin & Metzger (2000)"
retain_single_items: true
- name: "credibility_ai_no_user"
label: "Perceived credibility (no user)"
items:
- id: "credibility_noUser_1"
text: "unbelievable - believable"
inverse: false
- id: "credibility_noUser_2"
text: "inaccurate - accurate"
inverse: false
- id: "credibility_noUser_3"
text: "untrustworthy - trustworthy"
inverse: false
- id: "credibility_noUser_4"
text: "biased - unbiased"
inverse: false
- id: "credibility_noUser_5"
text: "not credible - credible"
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 5]
format: "bipolar"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = agree with left option, 5 = agree with right option"
output: "credibility_ai_no_user"
reference: "Flanagin & Metzger (2000)"
+81
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
questionnaire: "creepiness"
scales:
- name: "creepiness_favorite_ai_user"
label: "Perceived Creepiness Favorite AI"
items:
- id: "creepy_User_fav_1"
text: "I have a queasy feeling."
inverse: false
- id: "creepy_User_fav_2"
text: "I have a feeling that there is something shady."
inverse: false
- id: "creepy_User_fav_3"
text: "I feel uneasy."
inverse: false
- id: "creepy_User_fav_4"
text: "I have an indefinable fear."
inverse: false
- id: "creepy_User_fav_5"
text: "This interaction somehow feels threatening."
inverse: false
- id: "creepy_User_fav_6"
text: "I don't know how to judge the interaction with (piped fav AI)."
inverse: false
- id: "creepy_User_fav_7"
text: "I don't know exactly what is happening to me."
inverse: false
- id: "creepy_User_fav_8"
text: "Things are going on that I don't understand."
inverse: false
- id: "creepy_User_fav_9"
text: "I don't know exactly how to behave."
inverse: false
- id: "creepy_User_fav_10"
text: "I do not know exactly what to expect of this interaction."
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 7]
format: "Likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = Strongly disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Somewhat disagree, 4 = Neutral, 5 = Somewhat agree, 6 = Agree, 7 = Strongly agree"
output: "creepiness_favorite_ai_user"
reference: "Langer & König (2018); https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02220"
- name: "creepiness_ai_no_user"
label: "Perceived Creepiness AI"
items:
- id: "creepy_noUser_1"
text: "I have a queasy feeling."
inverse: false
- id: "creepy_noUser_2"
text: "I have a feeling that there is something shady."
inverse: false
- id: "creepy_noUser_3"
text: "I feel uneasy."
inverse: false
- id: "creepy_noUser_4"
text: "I have an indefinable fear."
inverse: false
- id: "creepy_noUser_5"
text: "This interaction somehow feels threatening."
inverse: false
- id: "creepy_noUser_6"
text: "I don't know how to judge the interaction with (piped fav AI)."
inverse: false
- id: "creepy_noUser_7"
text: "I don't know exactly what is happening to me."
inverse: false
- id: "creepy_noUser_8"
text: "Things are going on that I don't understand."
inverse: false
- id: "creepy_noUser_9"
text: "I don't know exactly how to behave."
inverse: false
- id: "creepy_noUser_10"
text: "I do not know exactly what to expect of this interaction."
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 7]
format: "Likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = Strongly disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Somewhat disagree, 4 = Neutral, 5 = Somewhat agree, 6 = Agree, 7 = Strongly agree"
output: "creepiness_ai_no_user"
reference: "Langer & König (2018); https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02220"
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
questionnaire: "delegation_comfort"
scales:
- name: "delegation_comfort"
label: "Comfort Level in Delegating Different Task Types to AI"
items:
- id: "delg_tsk_typs_1"
text: "Content Creation (including writing): generating written, visual or audio content from scratch. Examples: writing texts, composing music, creating graphics."
inverse: false
- id: "delg_tsk_typs_2"
text: "Content Creation (generating new ideas or concepts): Examples: brainstorming, idea generation for stories or projects, artistic inspiration."
inverse: false
- id: "delg_tsk_typs_3"
text: "Information Search (search engine replacement, looking up some facts)."
inverse: false
- id: "delg_tsk_typs_4"
text: "Advice and Recommendation (providing suggestions or guidance based on input data. Examples: product recommendations, lifestyle advice, travel suggestions)."
inverse: false
- id: "delg_tsk_typs_5"
text: "Explanations and Learning (offering detailed explanations or educational content. Examples: explaining complex concepts, tutoring in various subjects, answering questions)."
inverse: false
- id: "delg_tsk_typs_6"
text: "Analysis and Processing (conducting analytical tasks or data processing. Examples: coding assistance, data analysis, statistical computations, sentiment analysis)."
inverse: false
- id: "delg_tsk_typs_7"
text: "Automation and Productivity (automating routine tasks to improve efficiency. Examples: scheduling, reminders, managing emails, automating workflows)."
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 5]
format: "Likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = Extremely uncomfortable, 2 = Somewhat uncomfortable, 3 = Neither comfortable nor uncomfortable, 4 = Somewhat comfortable, 5 = Extremely comfortable"
output: "delegation_comfort"
reference: "self"
+64
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
questionnaire: "demographics"
scales:
- name: "age"
label: "Age of participants (numerical value 18-110)"
items:
- id: "age"
text: "age"
score_range: [18, 110]
format: "numeric"
calculation: "response"
response_options: "numeric age"
output: "age"
reference: "self"
- name: "gender"
label: "Gender"
items:
- id: "gender"
text: "Please indicate your gender"
calculation: "categorical"
response_options:
"1": "Male"
"2": "Female"
"3": "Non-binary / third gender"
"4": "Prefer not to say"
missing_response_option: ["4"]
output: "gender"
reference: "self"
- name: "education"
label: "Highest Level of Education Completed"
items:
- id: "education"
text: "What is the highest level of education you have completed?"
calculation: "ordinal"
response_options:
"1": "Some high school or less"
"2": "High school diploma or GED"
"3": "Some college, but no degree"
"4": "Associates or technical degree"
"5": "Bachelors degree"
"6": "Graduate or professional degree (MA, MS, MBA, PhD, JD, MD, DDS etc.)"
"7": "Prefer not to say"
missing_response_option: ["7"]
output: "education"
reference: "self"
- name: "income"
label: "Total Household Income Before Taxes (Past 12 Months)"
items:
- id: "income"
text: "What was your total household income before taxes during the past 12 months?"
calculation: "ordinal"
response_options:
"1": "Less than $25,000"
"2": "$25,000-$49,999"
"3": "$50,000-$74,999"
"4": "$75,000-$99,999"
"5": "$100,000-$149,999"
"6": "$150,000 or more"
"7": "Prefer not to say"
missing_response_option: ["7"]
output: "income"
reference: "self"
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
questionnaire: "distrust_toward_ai_corporations"
scales:
- name: "distrust_toward_ai_corporations_no_user"
label: "Distrust of Corporations Regarding AI Among Non-Users"
items:
- id: "distrust_corp_noUser_1"
text: "I am uneasy about a few big AI companies having too much influence."
inverse: false
- id: "distrust_corp_noUser_2"
text: "I worry that the growth of AI will concentrate power in major corporations."
inverse: false
- id: "distrust_corp_noUser_3"
text: "I do not trust large tech firms to use AI responsibly for everyone."
inverse: false
- id: "distrust_corp_noUser_4"
text: "I believe that current AI development favors corporate interests over individual rights."
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 7]
format: "Likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = Strongly disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Somewhat disagree, 4 = Neither disagree nor agree, 5 = Somewhat agree, 6 = Agree, 7 = Strongly agree"
output: "distrust_toward_ai_corporations_no_user"
reference: "self"
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
questionnaire: "ecological_concerns"
scales:
- name: "ecological_concerns_no_user"
label: "Environmental and Ethical Concerns About AI Among Non-Users"
items:
- id: "eco_concern_noUser_1"
text: "I am concerned that the widespread adoption of AI could have a negative impact on the environment."
inverse: false
- id: "eco_concern_noUser_2"
text: "I worry that AI development sometimes involves practices that are ethically questionable."
inverse: false
- id: "eco_concern_noUser_3"
text: "I believe that AI systems may contribute to ecological degradation."
inverse: false
- id: "eco_concern_noUser_4"
text: "I feel that the potential ethical issues associated with AI outweigh its benefits."
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 7]
format: "Likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = Strongly disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Somewhat disagree, 4 = Neither disagree nor agree, 5 = Somewhat agree, 6 = Agree, 7 = Strongly agree"
output: "ecological_concerns_no_user"
reference: "self"
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
questionnaire: "effect_on_behavior_toward_people"
scales:
- name: "effect_on_behavior_toward_people_user"
label: "Perceived Effect of AI Interaction on Behavior Toward People"
items:
- id: "effectpeople_User_1"
text: "The way I act toward AI affects how I interact with people."
inverse: false
- id: "effectpeople_User_2"
text: "Being polite to AI makes me more polite to others."
inverse: false
- id: "effectpeople_User_3"
text: "I talk to other people the same way I talk to AI."
inverse: false
- id: "effectpeople_User_4"
text: "I treat other people the same way I treat AI."
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 5]
format: "Likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = Strongly disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly agree"
output: "effect_on_behavior_toward_people_user"
reference: "self"
retain_single_items: true
- name: "effect_on_behavior_toward_people_no_user"
label: "Perceived Potential Effect of AI Interaction on Behavior Toward People (Non-Users)"
items:
- id: "effectpeople_noUser_1"
text: "The way I act toward AI would affect how I interact with people."
inverse: false
- id: "effectpeople_noUser_2"
text: "Being polite to AI would make me more polite to others."
inverse: false
- id: "effectpeople_noUser_3"
text: "I would talk to other people the same way I talk to AI."
inverse: false
- id: "effectpeople_noUser_4"
text: "I would treat other people the same way I treat AI."
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 5]
format: "Likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = Strongly disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly agree"
output: "effect_on_behavior_toward_people_no_user"
reference: "self"
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
questionnaire: "effects on work"
scales:
- name: "effects_on_work"
label: "Effects on work"
items:
- id: "effects_on_work_1"
text: "Using AI has increased my efficiency."
inverse: false
- id: "effects_on_work_2"
text: "Using AI has increased the quality of my work."
inverse: false
- id: "effects_on_work_3"
text: "Using AI has increased my productivity."
inverse: false
- id: "effects_on_work_4"
text: "Using AI has given me time and capacity to focus on other tasks."
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 5]
format: "likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree"
output: "effects_on_work"
reference: "self"
+21
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
questionnaire: "enjoyment"
scales:
- name: "enjoyment_favorite_ai_user"
label: "Enjoyment of favorite AI system"
items:
- id: "enjoyment_User_fav_1"
text: "I find using [favorite AI] to be enjoyable."
inverse: false
- id: "enjoyment_User_fav_2"
text: "The actual process of using [favorite AI] is pleasant."
inverse: false
- id: "enjoyment_User_fav_3"
text: "I have fun using [favorite AI]."
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 7]
format: "likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = strongly disagree, 7 = strongly agree"
output: "enjoyment_favorite_ai_user"
reference: "Venkatesh (2000)"
retain_single_items: true
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
questionnaire: "ethical_concerns_delegation"
scales:
- name: "ethical_concerns_delegation"
label: "Concern About Ethical Implications of Delegating Tasks to AI"
items:
- id: "cncrnd_ethic_delg"
text: "How concerned are you about the moral or ethical implications of delegating important tasks to AI?"
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 5]
format: "Likert"
calculation: "response"
response_options: "1 = Not at all concerned, 2 = A little bit concerned, 3 = Concerned, 4 = Strongly concerned, 5 = Extremely concerned"
output: "ethical_concerns_delegation"
reference: "self"
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
questionnaire: "ethical_concerns_general"
scales:
- name: "ethical_concerns_general_no_user"
label: "Ethical Concerns About AI Among Non-Users"
items:
- id: "ethical_impl_noUser_1"
text: "I worry that AI could be used to unfairly shape public opinion."
inverse: false
- id: "ethical_impl_noUser_2"
text: "I worry that relying more on AI could worsen social inequality."
inverse: false
- id: "ethical_impl_noUser_3"
text: "I believe that AI often overlooks ethical issues in its design."
inverse: false
- id: "ethical_impl_noUser_4"
text: "I feel that the social risks of AI outweigh its benefits."
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 7]
format: "Likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = Strongly disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Somewhat disagree, 4 = Neither disagree nor agree, 5 = Somewhat agree, 6 = Agree, 7 = Strongly agree"
output: "ethical_concerns_general_no_user"
reference: "self"
+43
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
questionnaire: "favorite_ai"
scales:
- name: "choice_favorite_ai_user"
label: "Choice of favorite AI system"
items:
- id: "choose_favAI_User"
text: "Which AI system is your favorite?"
open_ended_id: "choose_favAI_gnr_10_TEXT" # optional to also capture open-ended responses
calculation: "categorical"
response_options:
"1": "ChatGPT"
"2": "Microsoft Copilot (formerly Bing Chat)"
"3": "Claude"
"4": "Google AI incl. Google Gemini (formerly Bard)"
"5": "Alexa"
"6": "Siri/Apple Intelligence"
"7": "Samsung Galaxy AI"
"8": "Twitter/X Grok"
"9": "Meta AI"
"10": "Other"
output: "choice_favorite_ai_user"
reference: "self"
- name: "choice_favorite_ai_no_user"
label: "Choice of favorite AI system"
items:
- id: "choose_favAI_noUser"
text: "Which AI system is your favorite?"
open_ended_id: "choose_favAI_noUser_10_TEXT"
calculation: "categorical"
response_options:
"1": "ChatGPT"
"2": "Microsoft Copilot (formerly Bing Chat)"
"3": "Claude"
"4": "Google AI incl. Google Gemini (formerly Bard)"
"5": "Alexa"
"6": "Siri/Apple Intelligence"
"7": "Samsung Galaxy AI"
"8": "Twitter/X Grok"
"9": "Meta AI"
"10": "Other"
output: "choice_favorite_ai_no_user"
reference: "self"
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
questionnaire: "general_experience_ai"
scales:
- name: "general_experience_ai"
label: "General experience with AI systems"
items:
- id: "exp"
text: "General experience with AI systems"
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 5]
format: "ordinal"
calculation: "response"
response_options:
"1": "No Experience"
"2": "Minimal Experience"
"3": "Moderate Experience"
"4": "Strong Experience"
"5": "Extensive Experience"
output: "general_experience_ai"
reference: "self"
@@ -0,0 +1,104 @@
questionnaire: "generalized_mind_perception"
scales:
- name: "generalized_mind_perception_favorite_ai"
label: "Users' generalized mind perception of favorite AI system"
items:
- id: "mindperc_User_fav_1"
text: "can feel happy."
inverse: false
- id: "mindperc_User_fav_2"
text: "can love specific people."
inverse: false
- id: "mindperc_User_fav_3"
text: "can feel pleasure."
inverse: false
- id: "mindperc_User_fav_4"
text: "can experience gratitude."
inverse: false
- id: "mindperc_User_fav_5"
text: "can feel pain."
inverse: false
- id: "mindperc_User_fav_6"
text: "can feel stress."
inverse: false
- id: "mindperc_User_fav_7"
text: "can experience fear."
inverse: false
- id: "mindperc_User_fav_8"
text: "can feel tired."
inverse: false
- id: "moralagency_User_fav_1"
text: "has a sense for what is right and wrong."
inverse: false
- id: "moralagency_User_fav_5"
text: "behaves according to moral rules."
inverse: false
- id: "agency_User_fav_1"
text: "can create new goals."
inverse: false
- id: "agency_User_fav_2"
text: "can communicate with people."
inverse: false
- id: "mindperc_User_fav_9"
text: "can hear and see the world"
inverse: false
- id: "mindperc_User_fav_10"
text: "can learn from instruction."
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 5]
format: "likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = Strongly disagree, 5 = Strongly agree"
output: "generalized_mind_perception_favorite_ai"
reference: "Malle (2019), Banks (2019)"
- name: "generalized_mind_perception_no_user"
label: "Non-users' generalized mind perception of favorite AI system"
items:
- id: "mindper_noUser_1"
text: "can feel happy."
inverse: false
- id: "mindper_noUser_2"
text: "can love specific people."
inverse: false
- id: "mindper_noUser_3"
text: "can feel pleasure."
inverse: false
- id: "mindper_noUser_4"
text: "can experience gratitude."
inverse: false
- id: "mindper_noUser_5"
text: "can feel pain."
inverse: false
- id: "mindper_noUser_6"
text: "can feel stress."
inverse: false
- id: "mindper_noUser_7"
text: "can experience fear."
inverse: false
- id: "mindper_noUser_8"
text: "can feel tired."
inverse: false
- id: "moralagency_noUser_1"
text: "has a sense for what is right and wrong."
inverse: false
- id: "moralagency_noUser_5"
text: "behaves according to moral rules."
- id: "agency_noUser_1"
text: "can create new goals."
inverse: false
- id: "agency_noUser_2"
text: "can communicate with people."
inverse: false
- id: "mindper_noUser_9"
text: "can hear and see the world"
inverse: false
- id: "mindper_noUser_10"
text: "can learn from instruction."
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 5]
format: "likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = Strongly disagree, 5 = Strongly agree"
output: "generalized_mind_perception_no_user"
reference: "Malle (2019), Banks (2019)"
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
questionnaire: "hope_and_concern"
scales:
- name: "hope_and_concern"
label: "Hopes and Concerns About AI"
items:
- id: "hopeconcern_1"
text: "I hope AI will make life easier for most people."
inverse: false
- id: "hopeconcern_2"
text: "I hope AI will solve important global problems."
inverse: false
- id: "hopeconcern_3"
text: "I worry AI will take too many jobs."
inverse: true
- id: "hopeconcern_4"
text: "I worry AI will increase social inequalities."
inverse: true
score_range: [1, 5]
format: "Likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = Strongly disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly agree"
output: "hope_and_concern"
reference: "self"
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
questionnaire: "impact_in_general_on_skills"
scales:
- name: "impact_in_general_on_skills_user"
label: "Perceived Impact of AI on Personal Skill Development"
items:
- id: "skills_User_1"
text: "I believe AI will make me less skilled at tasks I currently do."
inverse: false
- id: "skills_User_2"
text: "I believe AI will help me learn new things."
inverse: false
- id: "skills_User_3"
text: "AI makes me rely less on my own abilities."
inverse: false
- id: "skills_User_4"
text: "AI helps me develop new skills."
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 5]
format: "Likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = Strongly disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly agree"
output: "impact_in_general_on_skills_user"
reference: "self"
- name: "impact_in_general_on_skills_no_user"
label: "Perceived Potential Impact of AI on Personal Skills (Non-Users)"
items:
- id: "skills_noUser_1"
text: "I believe AI would make me less skilled at tasks I currently do."
inverse: false
- id: "skills_noUser_2"
text: "I believe AI would help me learn new things."
inverse: false
- id: "skills_noUser_3"
text: "AI would make me rely less on my own abilities."
inverse: false
- id: "skills_noUser_4"
text: "AI would help me develop new skills."
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 5]
format: "Likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = Strongly disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly agree"
output: "impact_in_general_on_skills_no_user"
reference: "self"
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
questionnaire: "impact_of_delegation_on_skills"
scales:
- name: "impact_of_delegation_on_skills"
label: "Perceived Impact of Letting AI Perform Tasks on Personal Skills"
items:
- id: "letAI_tsk_impct_skil"
text: "Do you think letting AI do more tasks for you has improved or reduced your own skills?"
calculation: "ordinal"
response_options:
"1": "Strongly reduced"
"2": "Somewhat reduced"
"3": "No impact"
"4": "Somewhat improved"
"5": "Strongly improved"
"6": "I do not let AI make any tasks for me"
output: "impact_of_delegation_on_skills"
missing_response_option: ["6"]
reference: "self"
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
questionnaire: "intention_usage"
scales:
- name: "intention_use_favorite_ai"
label: "Intention to use favorite AI system"
items:
- id: "int_use_bhvr_User_fav_1"
text: "I intend to use [favorite AI] in the next 2 months."
inverse: false
- id: "int_use_bhvr_User_fav_2"
text: "I predict I would use [favorite AI] in the next 2 months."
inverse: false
- id: "int_use_bhvr_User_fav_3"
text: "I plan to use [favorite AI] in the next 2 months."
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 5]
format: "Likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree"
output: "intention_use_favorite_ai"
reference: "Venkatesh et al., 2003"
- name: "intention_use_no_user"
label: "Intention to use AI systems (no user)"
items:
- id: "int_use_bhvr_noUser_1"
text: "I intend to use an AI in the next 2 months."
inverse: false
- id: "int_use_bhvr_noUser_2"
text: "I predict I would use an AI in the next 2 months."
inverse: false
- id: "int_use_bhvr_noUser_3"
text: "I plan to use an AI in the next 2 months."
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 5]
format: "Likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree"
output: "intention_use_no_user"
reference: "Venkatesh et al., 2003"
+157
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,157 @@
questionnaire: "knowledge"
label: "Knowledge about AI"
scales:
- name: "subjective_knowledge"
label: "Subjective knowledge about AI"
items:
- id: "subj_know"
text: "How would you rate your knowledge about AI?"
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 5]
format: "bipolar"
calculation: "response"
response_options: "1 = very low, 5 = very high"
output: "subjective_knowledge"
reference: "self"
- name: "predicted_knowledge"
label: "Predicted knowledge (self-estimate in percent)"
items:
- id: "predict_know_1"
text: "What percent of these knowledge questions do you expect to answer correctly?"
inverse: false
score_range: [0, 100]
format: "percent"
calculation: "response"
response_options: "0-100%"
output: "predicted_knowledge"
reference: "self"
- name: "objective_knowledge"
label: "Objective AI knowledge (18 factual items)"
items:
- id: "obj_know_1_1"
text: "LLMs are trained with a large amount of text data (e.g., internet, social media)."
correct: 1
- id: "obj_know_1_2"
text: "LLMs calculate for their answers which word is most likely to come next."
correct: 1
- id: "obj_know_1_3"
text: "The responses of LLMs may be biased (e.g., racially) based on the data they were trained on."
correct: 1
- id: "obj_know_1_4"
text: "The statements of LLMs are always correct."
correct: 2
- id: "obj_know_1_5"
text: "Humans can still easily recognize AI-generated speech as artificial speech."
correct: 2
- id: "obj_know_1_6"
text: "LLMs can intentionally lie and spread false information."
correct: 2
- id: "obj_know_1_7"
text: "Humans can answer questions about a text better than LLMs."
correct: 2
- id: "obj_know_1_8"
text: "LLMs have learned to understand language like a human."
correct: 2
- id: "obj_know_1_9"
text: "LLMs have no real understanding of what they write."
correct: 1
- id: "obj_know_1_10"
text: "In machine learning, two common groups of strategies to train algorithms are supervised and unsupervised learning."
correct: 1
- id: "obj_know_1_11"
text: "Artificial neural networks attempt to fully replicate neural networks in the brain."
correct: 2
- id: "obj_know_1_12"
text: "Using AI, videos can be created that are indistinguishable from videos created by real people."
correct: 1
- id: "obj_know_1_13"
text: "A strong AI can make decisions on its own."
correct: 1
- id: "obj_know_1_14"
text: "Machine learning is based on statistical principles."
correct: 1
- id: "obj_know_1_15"
text: "A chatbot can correctly answer the question 'Will it rain tomorrow?' with a high probability."
correct: 1
- id: "obj_know_1_16"
text: "The language understanding of AI systems does not yet reach that of humans."
correct: 1
- id: "obj_know_1_17"
text: "The automatic generation of texts has already been used for years in journalism and e-commerce, for example."
correct: 1
- id: "obj_know_1_18"
text: "Content created by AI must be legally marked as such."
correct: 2
score_range: [1, 2]
calculation: "sum_correct"
response_options: "1 = TRUE, 2 = FALSE (participant answer is scored as correct if it matches 'correct')"
output: "objective_knowledge"
reference: "Adapted from Said et al., 2022 and Lermann Henestrosa & Kimmerle, 2024"
retain_single_items: true
- name: "objective_knowledge_confidence"
label: "Confidence in objective knowledge about AI"
items:
- id: "obj_know_2_1"
text: "LLMs are trained with a large amount of text data (e.g., internet, social media)."
inverse: false
- id: "obj_know_2_2"
text: "LLMs calculate for their answers which word is most likely to come next."
inverse: false
- id: "obj_know_2_3"
text: "The responses of LLMs may be biased (e.g., racially) based on the data they were trained on."
inverse: false
- id: "obj_know_2_4"
text: "The statements of LLMs are always correct."
inverse: false
- id: "obj_know_2_5"
text: "Humans can still easily recognize AI-generated speech as artificial speech."
inverse: false
- id: "obj_know_2_6"
text: "LLMs can intentionally lie and spread false information."
inverse: false
- id: "obj_know_2_7"
text: "Humans can answer questions about a text better than LLMs."
inverse: false
- id: "obj_know_2_8"
text: "LLMs have learned to understand language like a human."
inverse: false
- id: "obj_know_2_9"
text: "LLMs have no real understanding of what they write."
inverse: false
- id: "obj_know_2_10"
text: "In machine learning, two common groups of strategies to train algorithms are supervised and unsupervised learning."
inverse: false
- id: "obj_know_2_11"
text: "Artificial neural networks attempt to fully replicate neural networks in the brain."
inverse: false
- id: "obj_know_2_12"
text: "Using AI, videos can be created that are indistinguishable from videos created by real people."
inverse: false
- id: "obj_know_2_13"
text: "A strong AI can make decisions on its own."
inverse: false
- id: "obj_know_2_14"
text: "Machine learning is based on statistical principles."
inverse: false
- id: "obj_know_2_15"
text: "A chatbot can correctly answer the question 'Will it rain tomorrow?' with a high probability."
inverse: false
- id: "obj_know_2_16"
text: "The language understanding of AI systems does not yet reach that of humans."
inverse: false
- id: "obj_know_2_17"
text: "The automatic generation of texts has already been used for years in journalism and e-commerce, for example."
inverse: false
- id: "obj_know_2_18"
text: "Content created by AI must be legally marked as such."
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 6]
format: "Confidence scale"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = I guessed-50%, 2 = 60%, 3 = 70%, 4 = 80%, 5 = 90%, 6 = I am sure-100%"
output: "objective_knowledge_confidence"
reference: "Adapted from Said et al., 2022 and Lermann Henestrosa & Kimmerle, 2024"
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
questionnaire: "knowledge_how_to_start_using_ai"
scales:
- name: "knowledge_how_to_start_using_ai_no_user"
label: "Knowledge of How to Start Using AI"
items:
- id: "know_whr_start_noUser"
text: "If you would be prompted to now start using an AI system - would you know where to start and what to do?"
calculation: "categorical"
response_options:
"1": "Yes"
"2": "No, not really"
output: "knowledge_how_to_start_using_ai_no_user"
reference: "self"
+23
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
questionnaire: "lack_of_fomo"
scales:
- name: "lack_of_fomo_no_user"
label: "Lack of Fear of Missing Out on AI Among Non-Users"
items:
- id: "noFOMO_noUser_1"
text: "I do not worry about missing out on opportunities by not using AI."
inverse: false
- id: "noFOMO_noUser_2"
text: "I feel secure in my current technological approach even though many others are adopting AI."
inverse: false
- id: "noFOMO_noUser_3"
text: "I rarely feel pressured to keep up with the latest AI trends."
inverse: false
- id: "noFOMO_noUser_4"
text: "I am content with the technology I use and do not feel left behind by AI advancements."
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 7]
format: "Likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = Strongly disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Somewhat disagree, 4 = Neither disagree nor agree, 5 = Somewhat agree, 6 = Agree, 7 = Strongly agree"
output: "lack_of_fomo_no_user"
reference: "self"
+20
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
questionnaire: "loneliness"
scales:
- name: "loneliness"
label: "Perceived Loneliness"
items:
- id: "loneliness_1"
text: "... that you lack companionship?"
inverse: false
- id: "loneliness_2"
text: "... left out?"
inverse: false
- id: "loneliness_3"
text: "... isolated from others?"
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 3]
format: "Likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = hardly ever, 2 = some of the time, 3 = often"
output: "loneliness"
reference: "Hughes et al. (2008)"
@@ -0,0 +1,101 @@
questionnaire: "machine heuristic"
scales:
- name: "machine_heuristic_1_favorite_ai"
label: "Belief in the machine heuristic for favorite AI System (Set 1)"
items:
- id: "macheu_User_fav_1"
text: "expert"
inverse: false
- id: "macheu_User_fav_2"
text: "efficient"
inverse: false
- id: "macheu_User_fav_3"
text: "rigid"
inverse: false
- id: "macheu_User_fav_4"
text: "fair"
inverse: false
- id: "macheu_User_fav_5"
text: "complex"
inverse: false
- id: "macheu_User_fav_6"
text: "superfluous"
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 7]
format: "Likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = strongly disagree, 7 = strongly agree"
output: "machine_heuristic_1_favorite_ai"
reference: "Yang & Sundar, 2024"
- name: "machine_heuristic_1_no_user"
label: "Belief in the machine heuristic for AI systems (no user) (Set 1)"
items:
- id: "macheu_noUser_1"
text: "expert"
inverse: false
- id: "macheu_noUser_2"
text: "efficient"
inverse: false
- id: "macheu_noUser_3"
text: "rigid"
inverse: false
- id: "macheu_noUser_4"
text: "fair"
inverse: false
- id: "macheu_noUser_5"
text: "complex"
inverse: false
- id: "macheu_noUser_6"
text: "superfluous"
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 7]
format: "Likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = strongly disagree, 7 = strongly agree"
output: "machine_heuristic_1_no_user"
reference: "Yang & Sundar, 2024"
- name: "machine_heuristic_2_favorite_ai"
label: "Belief in the machine heuristic for favorite AI System (Set 2)"
items:
- id: "macheu_User_fav_7"
text: "neutral"
inverse: false
- id: "macheu_User_fav_8"
text: "unbiased"
inverse: false
- id: "macheu_User_fav_9"
text: "objective"
inverse: false
- id: "macheu_User_fav_10"
text: "accurate"
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 7]
format: "Likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = strongly disagree, 7 = strongly agree"
output: "machine_heuristic_2_favorite_ai"
reference: "Sundar & Kim, 2019"
- name: "machine_heuristic_2_no_user"
label: "Belief in the machine heuristic for AI systems (no user) (Set 2)"
items:
- id: "macheu_noUser_7"
text: "neutral"
inverse: false
- id: "macheu_noUser_8"
text: "unbiased"
inverse: false
- id: "macheu_noUser_9"
text: "objective"
inverse: false
- id: "macheu_noUser_10"
text: "accurate"
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 7]
format: "Likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = strongly disagree, 7 = strongly agree"
output: "machine_heuristic_2_no_user"
reference: "Sundar & Kim, 2019"
@@ -0,0 +1,101 @@
questionnaire: "microblog"
scales:
- name: "microblog_profile"
label: "Profile on Microblogging Services"
items:
- id: "microblog_profile"
text: "Do you have a profile on a microblogging service (e.g., Bluesky, X, Truth Social)?"
score_range: [1, 2]
format: "categorial"
calculation: "response"
response_options:
"1": "Yes"
"2": "No"
output: "microblog_profile"
reference: "self"
- name: "microblog_usage_frequency"
label: "Frequency of Logging into Microblogging Services"
items:
- id: "microblog_frequency"
text: "How often do you log in to microblogging services?"
score_range: [1, 7]
format: "ordinal"
calculation: "response"
response_options:
"1": "Less frequently"
"2": "Monthly"
"3": "A few times per month"
"4": "Weekly"
"5": "Several times a week"
"6": "Daily"
"7": "Several times a day"
output: "microblog_usage_frequency"
reference: "self"
- name: "microblog_usage_since_ai_use"
label: "Change in Microblogging Service Usage Since Starting AI Use"
items:
- id: "microblog_ai"
text: "Since you started using AI, do you use microblogging services less or more often?"
score_range: [1, 5]
format: "ordinal"
calculation: "response"
response_options:
"1": "A lot less"
"2": "Less"
"3": "About the same"
"4": "More"
"5": "A lot more"
output: "microblog_usage_since_ai_use"
reference: "self"
- name: "professional_social_network_profile"
label: "Profile on professional Social Networking Sites (SNS)"
items:
- id: "sns_profile"
text: "Do you have a profile on a social networking site for professional purposes (e.g., LinkedIn)?"
score_range: [1, 2]
format: "categorial"
calculation: "response"
response_options:
"1": "Yes"
"2": "No"
output: "professional_social_network_profile"
reference: "self"
- name: "professional_social_network_usage_frequency"
label: "Frequency of Logging into professional Social Networking Sites (SNS)"
items:
- id: "sns_frequency"
text: "How often do you log in to social networking sites for professional purposes?"
score_range: [1, 7]
format: "ordinal"
calculation: "response"
response_options:
"1": "Less frequently"
"2": "Monthly"
"3": "A few times per month"
"4": "Weekly"
"5": "Several times a week"
"6": "Daily"
"7": "Several times a day"
output: "professional_social_network_usage_frequency"
reference: "self"
- name: "professional_social_network_usage_since_ai_use"
label: "Change in Professional Social Networking Site Usage Since Starting AI Use"
items:
- id: "sns_ai"
text: "Since you started using AI, do you use professional social networking sites less or more often?"
score_range: [1, 5]
format: "Likert"
calculation: "response"
response_options:
"1": "A lot less"
"2": "Less"
"3": "About the same"
"4": "More"
"5": "A lot more"
output: "professional_social_network_usage_since_ai_use"
reference: "self"
@@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
questionnaire: "mind_perception"
scales:
- name: "mind_perception_favorite_ai"
label: "Perceived Mind Perception of Favorite AI"
items:
- id: "mindperc_User_fav_1"
text: "(piped fav AI) can feel happy."
inverse: false
- id: "mindperc_User_fav_2"
text: "(piped fav AI) can love specific people."
inverse: false
- id: "mindperc_User_fav_3"
text: "(piped fav AI) can feel pleasure."
inverse: false
- id: "mindperc_User_fav_4"
text: "(piped fav AI) can experience gratitude."
inverse: false
- id: "mindperc_User_fav_5"
text: "(piped fav AI) can feel pain."
inverse: false
- id: "mindperc_User_fav_6"
text: "(piped fav AI) can feel stress."
inverse: false
- id: "mindperc_User_fav_7"
text: "(piped fav AI) can experience fear."
inverse: false
- id: "mindperc_User_fav_8"
text: "(piped fav AI) can feel tired."
inverse: false
- id: "mindperc_User_fav_9"
text: "(piped fav AI) can see and hear the world."
inverse: false
- id: "mindperc_User_fav_10"
text: "(piped fav AI) can learn from instruction."
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 5]
format: "Likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = Strongly disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly agree"
output: "mind_perception_favorite_ai"
reference: "self"
- name: "mind_perception_no_user"
label: "Perceived Mind Perception of AI in General"
items:
- id: "mindper_noUser_1"
text: "AI can feel happy."
inverse: false
- id: "mindper_noUser_2"
text: "AI can love specific people."
inverse: false
- id: "mindper_noUser_3"
text: "AI can feel pleasure."
inverse: false
- id: "mindper_noUser_4"
text: "AI can experience gratitude."
inverse: false
- id: "mindper_noUser_5"
text: "AI can feel pain."
inverse: false
- id: "mindper_noUser_6"
text: "AI can feel stress."
inverse: false
- id: "mindper_noUser_7"
text: "AI can experience fear."
inverse: false
- id: "mindper_noUser_8"
text: "AI can feel tired."
inverse: false
- id: "mindper_noUser_9"
text: "AI can see and hear the world."
inverse: false
- id: "mindper_noUser_10"
text: "AI can learn from instruction."
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 5]
format: "Likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = Strongly disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly agree"
output: "mind_perception_no_user"
reference: "self"
+14
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
questionnaire: "modality"
scales:
- name: "modality_favorite_ai"
label: "Modality used when interacting with favorite AI system"
items:
- id: "mod_User_fav"
text: "How do you interact with [favorite AI] most often?"
calculation: "categorical"
response_options:
"1": "mostly via voice"
"12": "mix of voice and text"
"2": "mostly via text"
output: "modality_favorite_ai"
reference: "self"
+55
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
questionnaire: "needs"
scales:
- name: "need_to_belong"
label: "need to belong"
items:
- id: "pers_specific_1"
text: "I don't like being alone."
inverse: false
- id: "pers_specific_2"
text: "I have a strong 'need to belong.'"
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 7]
format: "likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = strongly disagree, 7 = strongly agree"
output: "need_to_belong"
reference: "2 items from Baumeister & Leary (2015)"
- name: "need_for_cognition"
label: "need for cognition"
items:
- id: "pers_specific_3"
text: "I would prefer complex to simple problems."
inverse: false
- id: "pers_specific_4"
text: "Thinking is not my idea of fun."
inverse: true
- id: "pers_specific_5"
text: "I would rather do something that requires little thought than something that is sure to challenge my thinking abilities."
inverse: true
score_range: [1, 7]
format: "likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = strongly disagree, 7 = strongly agree"
output: "need_for_cognition"
reference: "3 items from Lins de Holanda Coelho et al. (2020)"
- name: "need_for_closure"
label: "need for need_for_closure"
items:
- id: "pers_specific_6"
text: "I dont like situations that are uncertain."
inverse: false
- id: "pers_specific_7"
text: "I dislike questions which could be answered in many different ways."
inverse: false
- id: "pers_specific_8"
text: " I feel uncomfortable when I dont understand the reason why an event occurred in my life."
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 7]
format: "likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = strongly disagree, 7 = strongly agree"
output: "need_for_closure"
reference: "3 items from Roets & van Hiel (2011)"
@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
questionnaire: "needs_satisfaction"
scales:
- name: "need_satisfaction_morality"
label: "Satisfaction of morality need When interacting with AI systems"
items:
- id: "need_satisf_1"
text: "When interacting with AI systems, I feel a strong sense of moral fulfilment."
inverse: false
- id: "need_satisf_2"
text: "When interacting with AI systems, I feel that I am being a good person."
inverse: false
- id: "need_satisf_3"
text: "When interacting with AI systems, I embody my moral values."
inverse: false
- id: "need_satisf_4"
text: "When interacting with AI systems, I feel that I am doing the right thing."
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 5]
format: "Likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = Strongly disagree, 2 = Somewhat disagree, 3 = Neither agree nor disagree, 4 = Somewhat agree, 5 = Strongly agree"
output: "need_satisfaction_morality"
reference: "Prentice et al. (2019)"
- name: "need_satisfaction_competence"
label: "Satisfaction of competence need When interacting with AI systems"
items:
- id: "need_satisf_5"
text: "When interacting with AI systems, I feel very capable and effective."
inverse: false
- id: "need_satisf_6"
text: "When interacting with AI systems, I feel like a competent person."
inverse: false
- id: "need_satisf_7"
text: "When interacting with AI systems, I feel that I know what Im doing."
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 5]
format: "Likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = Strongly disagree, 2 = Somewhat disagree, 3 = Neither agree nor disagree, 4 = Somewhat agree, 5 = Strongly agree"
output: "need_satisfaction_competence"
reference: "Prentice et al. (2019)"
- name: "need_satisfaction_autonomy"
label: "Satisfaction of autonomy need When interacting with AI systems"
items:
- id: "need_satisf_8"
text: "When interacting with AI systems, I feel free to be who I am."
inverse: false
- id: "need_satisf_9"
text: "When interacting with AI systems, I have a say in what happens and I can voice my opinion."
inverse: false
- id: "need_satisf_10"
text: "When interacting with AI systems, I believe that my choices are based on my true desires and values."
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 5]
format: "Likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = Strongly disagree, 2 = Somewhat disagree, 3 = Neither agree nor disagree, 4 = Somewhat agree, 5 = Strongly agree"
output: "need_satisfaction_autonomy"
reference: "Prentice et al. (2019)"
- name: "need_satisfaction_relatedness"
label: "Satisfaction of relatedness need When interacting with AI systems"
items:
- id: "need_satisf_11"
text: "When interacting with AI systems, I feel the support of others."
inverse: false
- id: "need_satisf_12"
text: "When interacting with AI systems, I feel a sense of closeness and connectedness to others."
inverse: false
- id: "need_satisf_13"
text: "When interacting with AI systems, I feel connected."
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 5]
format: "Likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = Strongly disagree, 2 = Somewhat disagree, 3 = Neither agree nor disagree, 4 = Somewhat agree, 5 = Strongly agree"
output: "need_satisfaction_relatedness"
reference: "self"
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
questionnaire: "number_of_tasks_delegated_to_ai"
scales:
- name: "number_of_tasks_delegated_to_ai"
label: "Number of Tasks Completed Entirely Using AI Assistance"
items:
- id: "no_tsks_delg"
text: "In the last two months, how many tasks did you complete entirely using AI assistance? (By task we mean anything you personally consider a task)"
calculation: "ordinal"
response_options:
"1": "None"
"2": "12"
"3": "35"
"4": "610"
"5": "More than 10"
output: "number_of_tasks_delegated_to_ai"
reference: "self"
@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
questionnaire: "parasocial_behavior"
scales:
- name: "parasocial_behavior_favorite_ai"
label: "Extend to which you would behave in the following ways towards your favorite AI"
items:
- id: "behavior_User_fav_1"
text: "Say “thank you” and “good bye” to it."
inverse: false
- id: "behavior_User_fav_2"
text: "Occasionally react very emotionally towards it."
inverse: false
- id: "behavior_User_fav_3"
text: "Sometimes gesture towards it."
inverse: false
- id: "behavior_User_fav_4"
text: "Spontaneously say something to it in certain moments."
inverse: false
- id: "behavior_User_fav_5"
text: "Occasionally shout something at it."
inverse: false
- id: "behavior_User_fav_6"
text: "Express my thoughts and opinions to it."
inverse: false
- id: "behavior_User_fav_7"
text: "Am unfriendly or rude."
inverse: false
- id: "behavior_User_fav_8"
text: "Treat it the same way I treat other people."
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 7]
format: "Likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = Not at all, 7 = Very much"
output: "parasocial_behavior_favorite_ai"
reference: "adapted from Schramm, H., & Hartmann, T. (2008); https://doi.org/10.1515/COMM.2008.025"
retain_single_items: true
- name: "parasocial_behavior_no_user"
label: "Expected Behaviors If You Started Interacting with AI"
items:
- id: "behavior_noUser_1"
text: "Say “thank you” and “good bye” to it."
inverse: false
- id: "behavior_noUser_2"
text: "Occasionally react very emotionally towards it."
inverse: false
- id: "behavior_noUser_3"
text: "Sometimes gesture towards it."
inverse: false
- id: "behavior_noUser_4"
text: "Spontaneously say something to it in certain moments."
inverse: false
- id: "behavior_noUser_5"
text: "Occasionally shout something at it."
inverse: false
- id: "behavior_noUser_6"
text: "Express my thoughts and opinions to it."
inverse: false
- id: "behavior_noUser_7"
text: "Am unfriendly or rude."
inverse: false
- id: "behavior_noUser_8"
text: "Treat it the same way I treat other people."
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 7]
format: "Likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = Not at all, 7 = Very much"
output: "parasocial_behavior_no_user"
reference: "adapted from Schramm, H., & Hartmann, T. (2008); https://doi.org/10.1515/COMM.2008.025"
@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
questionnaire: "perceived_anthropomorphism"
scales:
- name: "perceived_anthropomorphism_favorite_ai"
label: "Perceived anthropomorphism of favorite AI system"
items:
- id: "anthro_User_fav_1"
text: "fake - natural"
inverse: false
- id: "anthro_User_fav_2"
text: "machinelike - humanlike"
inverse: false
- id: "anthro_User_fav_3"
text: "unconscious - conscious"
inverse: false
- id: "anthro_User_fav_4"
text: "artificial - lifelike"
inverse: false
- id: "anthro_User_fav_5"
text: "rigid - elegant"
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 5]
format: "bipolar"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = agree with left option, 5 = agree with right option"
output: "perceived_anthropomorphism_favorite_ai"
reference: "Bartneck et al. (2009)"
- name: "perceived_anthropomorphism_ai_no_user"
label: "Perceived anthropomorphism (no user)"
items:
- id: "anthro_noUser_1"
text: "fake - natural"
inverse: false
- id: "anthro_noUser_2"
text: "machinelike - humanlike"
inverse: false
- id: "anthro_noUser_3"
text: "unconscious - conscious"
inverse: false
- id: "anthro_noUser_4"
text: "artificial - lifelike"
inverse: false
- id: "anthro_noUser_5"
text: "rigid - elegant"
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 5]
format: "bipolar"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = agree with left option, 5 = agree with right option"
output: "perceived_anthropomorphism_ai_no_user"
reference: "Bartneck et al. (2009)"
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
questionnaire: "perceived_changes_attitudes_usage"
scales:
- name: "perceived_changes_attitudes_usage"
label: "Perceived Changes in Attitudes and Usage of AI Over the Past Year"
items:
- id: "changes_User_1"
text: "I feel more comfortable using AI than I did a year ago."
inverse: false
- id: "changes_User_2"
text: "I trust AI more now than I did a year ago."
inverse: false
- id: "changes_User_3"
text: "I use AI more frequently now than I did a year ago."
inverse: false
- id: "changes_User_4"
text: "I feel more anxious about AI than I did a year ago."
inverse: true
score_range: [1, 5]
format: "Likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = Strongly disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly agree"
output: "perceived_changes_attitudes_usage"
reference: "self"
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
questionnaire: "perceived_intelligence"
scales:
- name: "perceived_intelligence_favorite_ai"
label: "Perceived intelligence of favorite AI system"
items:
- id: "intell_User_fav_1"
text: "foolish - sensible"
inverse: false
- id: "intell_User_fav_2"
text: "incompetent - competent"
inverse: false
- id: "intell_User_fav_3"
text: "unintelligent - intelligent"
inverse: false
- id: "intell_User_fav_4"
text: "irresponsible - responsible"
inverse: false
- id: "intell_User_fav_5"
text: "stupid - knowledgeable"
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 5]
format: "bipolar"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = agree with left option, 5 = agree with right option"
output: "perceived_intelligence_favorite_ai"
reference: "Bartneck et al. (2009)"
retain_single_items: true
- name: "perceived_intelligence_ai_no_user"
label: "Perceived intelligence of AI (no user)"
items:
- id: "intell_noUser_1"
text: "foolish - sensible"
inverse: false
- id: "intell_noUser_2"
text: "incompetent - competent"
inverse: false
- id: "intell_noUser_3"
text: "unintelligent - intelligent"
inverse: false
- id: "intell_noUser_4"
text: "irresponsible - responsible"
inverse: false
- id: "intell_noUser_5"
text: "stupid - knowledgeable"
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 5]
format: "bipolar"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = agree with left option, 5 = agree with right option"
output: "perceived_intelligence_ai_no_user"
reference: "Bartneck et al. (2009)"
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
questionnaire: "perceived_lack_of_need"
scales:
- name: "perceived_lack_of_need_no_user"
label: "Perceived Lack of Need for AI Among Non-Users"
items:
- id: "lack_of_need_noUser_1"
text: "I do not see any additional benefit in using AI when traditional methods already meet my needs."
inverse: false
- id: "lack_of_need_noUser_2"
text: "The tools I currently use are entirely sufficient for my work and personal tasks."
inverse: false
- id: "lack_of_need_noUser_3"
text: "I believe that AI does not offer a significant improvement over my existing technologies."
inverse: false
- id: "lack_of_need_noUser_4"
text: "I am satisfied with my current solutions and feel no compulsion to try AI-based alternatives."
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 7]
format: "Likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = Strongly disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Somewhat disagree, 4 = Neither disagree nor agree, 5 = Somewhat agree, 6 = Agree, 7 = Strongly agree"
output: "perceived_lack_of_need_no_user"
reference: "self"
@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
questionnaire: "perceived_moral_agency"
scales:
- name: "perceived_moral_agency_favorite_ai"
label: "Perceived Moral Agency of Favorite AI"
items:
- id: "moralagency_User_fav_1"
text: "(piped fav AI) has a sense for what is right and wrong."
inverse: false
- id: "moralagency_User_fav_2"
text: "(piped fav AI) can think through whether an action is moral."
inverse: false
- id: "moralagency_User_fav_3"
text: "(piped fav AI) might feel obligated to behave in a moral way."
inverse: false
- id: "moralagency_User_fav_4"
text: "(piped fav AI) is capable of being rational about good and evil."
inverse: false
- id: "moralagency_User_fav_5"
text: "(piped fav AI) behaves according to moral rules."
inverse: false
- id: "moralagency_User_fav_6"
text: "(piped fav AI) would refrain from doing things that have painful repercussions."
inverse: false
- id: "moralagency_User_fav_7"
text: "(piped fav AI) can only behave how it is programmed to behave."
inverse: true
- id: "moralagency_User_fav_8"
text: "(piped fav AI)'s actions are the result of its programming."
inverse: true
- id: "moralagency_User_fav_9"
text: "(piped fav AI) can only do what humans tell it to do."
inverse: true
- id: "moralagency_User_fav_10"
text: "(piped fav AI) would never do anything it was not programmed to do."
inverse: true
score_range: [1, 5]
format: "Likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = Strongly disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly agree"
output: "perceived_moral_agency_favorite_ai"
reference: "self"
- name: "perceived_moral_agency_no_user"
label: "Perceived Moral Agency of AI in General"
items:
- id: "moralagency_noUser_1"
text: "AI has a sense for what is right and wrong."
inverse: false
- id: "moralagency_noUser_2"
text: "AI can think through whether an action is moral."
inverse: false
- id: "moralagency_noUser_3"
text: "AI might feel obligated to behave in a moral way."
inverse: false
- id: "moralagency_noUser_4"
text: "AI is capable of being rational about good and evil."
inverse: false
- id: "moralagency_noUser_5"
text: "AI behaves according to moral rules."
inverse: false
- id: "moralagency_noUser_6"
text: "AI would refrain from doing things that have painful repercussions."
inverse: false
- id: "moralagency_noUser_7"
text: "AI can only behave how it is programmed to behave."
inverse: true
- id: "moralagency_noUser_8"
text: "AI's actions are the result of its programming."
inverse: true
- id: "moralagency_noUser_9"
text: "AI can only do what humans tell it to do."
inverse: true
- id: "moralagency_noUser_10"
text: "AI would never do anything it was not programmed to do."
inverse: true
score_range: [1, 5]
format: "Likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = Strongly disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly agree"
output: "perceived_moral_agency_no_user"
reference: "self"
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
questionnaire: "perceived_reliance_on_ai"
scales:
- name: "perceived_reliance_on_ai_user"
label: "Perceived Reliance on AI in General"
items:
- id: "perc_reliance_User_1"
text: "I feel unprotected when I do not have access to AI."
inverse: false
- id: "perc_reliance_User_2"
text: "I am concerned about the idea of being left behind in my tasks or projects if I do not use AI."
inverse: false
- id: "perc_reliance_User_3"
text: "I do everything possible to stay updated with AI to impress or remain relevant in my field."
inverse: false
- id: "perc_reliance_User_4"
text: "I constantly need validation or feedback from AI systems to feel confident in my decisions."
inverse: false
- id: "perc_reliance_User_5"
text: "I fear that AI might replace my current skills or abilities."
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 5]
format: "Likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = Strongly disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly agree"
output: "perceived_reliance_on_ai_user"
reference: "self"
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
questionnaire: "perceived_role_ai_should_take"
scales:
- name: "perceived_role_ai_should_take_no_user"
label: "Perceived Role AI Systems SHOULD Take"
items:
- id: "shld_role_part_noUser"
text: "In your understanding: What role SHOULD AI systems generally take when one interacts with them?"
open_ended_id: "shld_role_part_noUser_11_TEXT"
calculation: "categorical"
response_options:
"1": "Child"
"2": "Servant"
"3": "Pet"
"4": "Student"
"5": "Partner"
"6": "Teacher"
"7": "Boss"
"8": "Friend"
"9": "Colleague"
"10": "Master"
"11": "Other"
output: "perceived_role_ai_should_take_no_user"
reference: "self"
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
questionnaire: "perceived_role_of_ai"
scales:
- name: "perceived_role_of_ai_favorite_ai"
label: "Perceived Role of Favorite AI in Interaction"
items:
- id: "role_partner_User_fav"
text: "What role does (piped fav AI) take when you interact with it? Please select the option that fits most in most cases."
open_ended_id: "role_partner_User_fav_11_TEXT"
calculation: "categorical"
response_options:
"1": "Child"
"2": "Servant"
"3": "Pet"
"4": "Student"
"5": "Partner"
"6": "Teacher"
"7": "Boss"
"8": "Friend"
"9": "Colleague"
"10": "Master"
"11": "Other"
output: "perceived_role_of_ai_favorite_ai"
reference: "Sarigul, B., Schneider, F. M., & Utz, S. (2025). Believe it or not? https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2375797"
- name: "perceived_role_of_ai_no_user"
label: "Perceived Role of AI Systems in Interaction"
items:
- id: "role_partner_noUser"
text: "In your understanding: What role do AI systems generally take when one interacts with them? Please select the option that fits most in most cases."
open_ended_id: "role_partner_noUser_11_TEXT"
calculation: "categorical"
response_options:
"1": "Child"
"2": "Servant"
"3": "Pet"
"4": "Student"
"5": "Partner"
"6": "Teacher"
"7": "Boss"
"8": "Friend"
"9": "Colleague"
"10": "Master"
"11": "Other"
output: "perceived_role_of_ai_no_user"
reference: "Sarigul, B., Schneider, F. M., & Utz, S. (2025). Believe it or not? https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2375797"
@@ -0,0 +1,297 @@
questionnaire: "perceived_task_characteristics_delegation"
scales:
- name: "perceived_task_characteristics_email"
label: "Perceived Task Characteristics and Trust in AI for Writing a Work-Related Email"
items:
- id: "del_task_diff_1_1"
text: "This task requires social skills to complete."
inverse: false
- id: "del_task_diff_1_2"
text: "This task requires creativity to complete."
inverse: false
- id: "del_task_diff_1_3"
text: "This task requires a great deal of time or effort to complete."
inverse: false
- id: "del_task_diff_1_4"
text: "It takes significant training or expertise to be qualified for this task."
inverse: false
- id: "del_task_diff_1_5"
text: "I am confident in my own abilities to complete this task."
inverse: false
- id: "del_task_diff_1_6"
text: "I trust an AI systems ability to reliably complete the task."
inverse: false
- id: "del_task_diff_1_7"
text: "Understanding the reasons behind the AI agent's actions is important for me to trust the AI agent on this task (e.g., explanations are necessary)."
inverse: false
- id: "del_task_diff_1_8"
text: "I trust an AI system's decisions to protect my interests and align with my values for this task."
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 3]
format: "Agreement Scale"
calculation: "mapped_mean"
response_options:
1: -1 # Disagree
2: 1 # Agree
3: 0 # Neutral
output: "perceived_task_characteristics_email"
reference: "Lubars, B., & Tan, C. (2019)"
- name: "perceived_task_characteristics_formal_letter"
label: "Perceived Task Characteristics and Trust in AI for Writing a Formal Letter"
items:
- id: "del_task_diff_2_1"
text: "This task requires social skills to complete."
inverse: false
- id: "del_task_diff_2_2"
text: "This task requires creativity to complete."
inverse: false
- id: "del_task_diff_2_3"
text: "This task requires a great deal of time or effort to complete."
inverse: false
- id: "del_task_diff_2_4"
text: "It takes significant training or expertise to be qualified for this task."
inverse: false
- id: "del_task_diff_2_5"
text: "I am confident in my own abilities to complete this task."
inverse: false
- id: "del_task_diff_2_6"
text: "I trust an AI systems ability to reliably complete the task."
inverse: false
- id: "del_task_diff_2_7"
text: "Understanding the reasons behind the AI agent's actions is important for me to trust the AI agent on this task (e.g., explanations are necessary)."
inverse: false
- id: "del_task_diff_2_8"
text: "I trust an AI system's decisions to protect my interests and align with my values for this task."
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 3]
format: "Agreement Scale"
calculation: "mapped_mean"
response_options:
1: -1 # Disagree
2: 1 # Agree
3: 0 # Neutral
output: "perceived_task_characteristics_formal_letter"
reference: "Lubars, B., & Tan, C. (2019)"
- name: "perceived_task_characteristics_job_application"
label: "Perceived Task Characteristics and Trust in AI for Writing a Job Application"
items:
- id: "del_task_diff_3_1"
text: "This task requires social skills to complete."
inverse: false
- id: "del_task_diff_3_2"
text: "This task requires creativity to complete."
inverse: false
- id: "del_task_diff_3_3"
text: "This task requires a great deal of time or effort to complete."
inverse: false
- id: "del_task_diff_3_4"
text: "It takes significant training or expertise to be qualified for this task."
inverse: false
- id: "del_task_diff_3_5"
text: "I am confident in my own abilities to complete this task."
inverse: false
- id: "del_task_diff_3_6"
text: "I trust an AI systems ability to reliably complete the task."
inverse: false
- id: "del_task_diff_3_7"
text: "Understanding the reasons behind the AI agent's actions is important for me to trust the AI agent on this task (e.g., explanations are necessary)."
inverse: false
- id: "del_task_diff_3_8"
text: "I trust an AI system's decisions to protect my interests and align with my values for this task."
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 3]
format: "Agreement Scale"
calculation: "mapped_mean"
response_options:
1: -1 # Disagree
2: 1 # Agree
3: 0 # Neutral
output: "perceived_task_characteristics_job_application"
reference: "Lubars, B., & Tan, C. (2019)"
- name: "perceived_task_characteristics_meeting_summary"
label: "Perceived Task Characteristics and Trust in AI for Writing a Brief Business Meeting Summary"
items:
- id: "del_task_diff_4_1"
text: "This task requires social skills to complete."
inverse: false
- id: "del_task_diff_4_2"
text: "This task requires creativity to complete."
inverse: false
- id: "del_task_diff_4_3"
text: "This task requires a great deal of time or effort to complete."
inverse: false
- id: "del_task_diff_4_4"
text: "It takes significant training or expertise to be qualified for this task."
inverse: false
- id: "del_task_diff_4_5"
text: "I am confident in my own abilities to complete this task."
inverse: false
- id: "del_task_diff_4_6"
text: "I trust an AI systems ability to reliably complete the task."
inverse: false
- id: "del_task_diff_4_7"
text: "Understanding the reasons behind the AI agent's actions is important for me to trust the AI agent on this task (e.g., explanations are necessary)."
inverse: false
- id: "del_task_diff_4_8"
text: "I trust an AI system's decisions to protect my interests and align with my values for this task."
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 3]
format: "Agreement Scale"
calculation: "mapped_mean"
response_options:
1: -1 # Disagree
2: 1 # Agree
3: 0 # Neutral
output: "perceived_task_characteristics_meeting_summary"
reference: "Lubars, B., & Tan, C. (2019)"
- name: "perceived_task_characteristics_condolence_card"
label: "Perceived Task Characteristics and Trust in AI for Writing a Condolence Card"
items:
- id: "del_task_diff_5_1"
text: "This task requires social skills to complete."
inverse: false
- id: "del_task_diff_5_2"
text: "This task requires creativity to complete."
inverse: false
- id: "del_task_diff_5_3"
text: "This task requires a great deal of time or effort to complete."
inverse: false
- id: "del_task_diff_5_4"
text: "It takes significant training or expertise to be qualified for this task."
inverse: false
- id: "del_task_diff_5_5"
text: "I am confident in my own abilities to complete this task."
inverse: false
- id: "del_task_diff_5_6"
text: "I trust an AI systems ability to reliably complete the task."
inverse: false
- id: "del_task_diff_5_7"
text: "Understanding the reasons behind the AI agent's actions is important for me to trust the AI agent on this task (e.g., explanations are necessary)."
inverse: false
- id: "del_task_diff_5_8"
text: "I trust an AI system's decisions to protect my interests and align with my values for this task."
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 3]
format: "Agreement Scale"
calculation: "mapped_mean"
response_options:
1: -1 # Disagree
2: 1 # Agree
3: 0 # Neutral
output: "perceived_task_characteristics_condolence_card"
reference: "Lubars, B., & Tan, C. (2019)"
- name: "perceived_task_characteristics_social_media_post"
label: "Perceived Task Characteristics and Trust in AI for Writing a Social Media Post"
items:
- id: "del_task_diff_6_1"
text: "This task requires social skills to complete."
inverse: false
- id: "del_task_diff_6_2"
text: "This task requires creativity to complete."
inverse: false
- id: "del_task_diff_6_3"
text: "This task requires a great deal of time or effort to complete."
inverse: false
- id: "del_task_diff_6_4"
text: "It takes significant training or expertise to be qualified for this task."
inverse: false
- id: "del_task_diff_6_5"
text: "I am confident in my own abilities to complete this task."
inverse: false
- id: "del_task_diff_6_6"
text: "I trust an AI systems ability to reliably complete the task."
inverse: false
- id: "del_task_diff_6_7"
text: "Understanding the reasons behind the AI agent's actions is important for me to trust the AI agent on this task (e.g., explanations are necessary)."
inverse: false
- id: "del_task_diff_6_8"
text: "I trust an AI system's decisions to protect my interests and align with my values for this task."
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 3]
format: "Agreement Scale"
calculation: "mapped_mean"
response_options:
1: -1 # Disagree
2: 1 # Agree
3: 0 # Neutral
output: "perceived_task_characteristics_social_media_post"
reference: "Lubars, B., & Tan, C. (2019)"
- name: "perceived_task_characteristics_personal_letter"
label: "Perceived Task Characteristics and Trust in AI for Writing a Personal Letter"
items:
- id: "del_task_diff_7_1"
text: "This task requires social skills to complete."
inverse: false
- id: "del_task_diff_7_2"
text: "This task requires creativity to complete."
inverse: false
- id: "del_task_diff_7_3"
text: "This task requires a great deal of time or effort to complete."
inverse: false
- id: "del_task_diff_7_4"
text: "It takes significant training or expertise to be qualified for this task."
inverse: false
- id: "del_task_diff_7_5"
text: "I am confident in my own abilities to complete this task."
inverse: false
- id: "del_task_diff_7_6"
text: "I trust an AI systems ability to reliably complete the task."
inverse: false
- id: "del_task_diff_7_7"
text: "Understanding the reasons behind the AI agent's actions is important for me to trust the AI agent on this task (e.g., explanations are necessary)."
inverse: false
- id: "del_task_diff_7_8"
text: "I trust an AI system's decisions to protect my interests and align with my values for this task."
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 3]
format: "Agreement Scale"
calculation: "mapped_mean"
response_options:
1: -1 # Disagree
2: 1 # Agree
3: 0 # Neutral
output: "perceived_task_characteristics_personal_letter"
reference: "Lubars, B., & Tan, C. (2019)"
- name: "perceived_task_characteristics_birthday_invitation"
label: "Perceived Task Characteristics and Trust in AI for Writing a Birthday Invitation Card"
items:
- id: "del_task_diff_8_1"
text: "This task requires social skills to complete."
inverse: false
- id: "del_task_diff_8_2"
text: "This task requires creativity to complete."
inverse: false
- id: "del_task_diff_8_3"
text: "This task requires a great deal of time or effort to complete."
inverse: false
- id: "del_task_diff_8_4"
text: "It takes significant training or expertise to be qualified for this task."
inverse: false
- id: "del_task_diff_8_5"
text: "I am confident in my own abilities to complete this task."
inverse: false
- id: "del_task_diff_8_6"
text: "I trust an AI systems ability to reliably complete the task."
inverse: false
- id: "del_task_diff_8_7"
text: "Understanding the reasons behind the AI agent's actions is important for me to trust the AI agent on this task (e.g., explanations are necessary)."
inverse: false
- id: "del_task_diff_8_8"
text: "I trust an AI system's decisions to protect my interests and align with my values for this task."
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 3]
format: "Agreement Scale"
calculation: "mapped_mean"
response_options:
1: -1 # Disagree
2: 1 # Agree
3: 0 # Neutral
output: "perceived_task_characteristics_birthday_invitation"
reference: "Lubars, B., & Tan, C. (2019)"
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
questionnaire: "perception_of_being_left_behind"
scales:
- name: "perception_of_being_left_behind"
label: "Perceived Ability to Keep Up with AI Advancements"
items:
- id: "leftbehind_1"
text: "I feel left behind by how quickly AI is advancing."
inverse: false
- id: "leftbehind_2"
text: "I worry I wont keep up with new AI tools."
inverse: false
- id: "leftbehind_3"
text: "I feel confident I can adapt to AI changes."
inverse: true
- id: "leftbehind_4"
text: "I think AI is moving faster than I can learn."
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 5]
format: "Likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = Strongly disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly agree"
output: "perception_of_being_left_behind"
reference: "self"
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
questionnaire: "perception_tool_actor"
scales:
- name: "perception_tool_actor_favorite_ai"
label: "Perception of favorite AI system as tool or social actor"
items:
- id: "partner_tool_User_fav"
text: "How do you usually perceive [favorite AI] while using it?"
score_range: [1, 2]
format: "categorical"
calculation: "categorical"
response_options:
"1": "More like a tool"
"2": "More like a social actor"
output: "perception_tool_actor_favorite_ai"
reference: "self"
- name: "perception_tool_actor_no_user"
label: "Perception of general AI system as tool or social actor"
items:
- id: "partner_tool_noUser"
text: "How do you usually perceive AI systems in general?"
score_range: [1, 2]
format: "categorical"
calculation: "categorical"
response_options:
"1": "More like a tool"
"2": "More like a social actor"
output: "perception_tool_actor_no_user"
reference: "self"
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
questionnaire: "personality_specific_traits"
scales:
- name: "personality_specific_traits"
label: "Personality-Specific Traits"
items:
- id: "pers_specific_1"
text: "I don't like being alone."
inverse: false
- id: "pers_specific_2"
text: "I have a strong 'need to belong.'"
inverse: false
- id: "pers_specific_3"
text: "I would prefer complex to simple problems."
inverse: false
- id: "pers_specific_4"
text: "Thinking is not my idea of fun."
inverse: true
- id: "pers_specific_5"
text: "I would rather do something that requires little thought than something that is sure to challenge my thinking abilities."
inverse: true
- id: "pers_specific_6"
text: "I dont like situations that are uncertain."
inverse: false
- id: "pers_specific_7"
text: "I dislike questions which could be answered in many different ways."
inverse: false
- id: "pers_specific_8"
text: "I feel uncomfortable when I dont understand the reason why an event occurred in my life."
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 7]
format: "Likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = Strongly disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Somewhat disagree, 4 = Neither disagree nor agree, 5 = Somewhat agree, 6 = Agree, 7 = Strongly agree"
output: "personality_specific_traits"
reference: "Leary, M. R et al (2013); https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2013.819511"
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
questionnaire: "potential_motivators_for_ai_usage"
scales:
- name: "potential_motivators_for_ai_usage"
label: "Motivators that could increase AI Usage"
items:
- id: "motivator_1"
text: "I would use AI if it were easier to understand."
inverse: false
- id: "motivator_2"
text: "I would use AI if it felt more trustworthy."
inverse: false
- id: "motivator_3"
text: "I would use AI if it saved me time."
inverse: false
- id: "motivator_4"
text: "I would use AI if it fit my daily routines."
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 5]
format: "Likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = Strongly disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly agree"
output: "potential_motivators_for_ai_usage"
reference: "self"
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
questionnaire: "preference_for_status_quo"
scales:
- name: "preference_for_status_quo_no_user"
label: "Preference for Status Quo Among Non-Users of AI"
items:
- id: "pref_statu_Quo_noUser_1"
text: "I feel confident in my current digital skills, so I do not need additional AI assistance."
inverse: false
- id: "pref_statu_Quo_noUser_2"
text: "I am comfortable using the digital tools I have mastered without incorporating AI."
inverse: false
- id: "pref_statu_Quo_noUser_3"
text: "Learning new AI technologies seems unnecessary given my proficiency with existing methods."
inverse: false
- id: "pref_statu_Quo_noUser_4"
text: "I prefer to rely on familiar digital practices rather than exploring novel AI innovations."
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 7]
format: "Likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = Strongly disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Somewhat disagree, 4 = Neither disagree nor agree, 5 = Somewhat agree, 6 = Agree, 7 = Strongly agree"
output: "preference_for_status_quo_no_user"
reference: "self"
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
questionnaire: "preferred_level_of_delegation"
scales:
- name: "preferred_level_of_delegation"
label: "Preferred Level of AI Assistance for Writing Tasks"
items:
- id: "delg_1"
text: "Writing a work-related email."
inverse: false
- id: "delg_2"
text: "Writing a formal letter, e.g., to public authority."
inverse: false
- id: "delg_3"
text: "Writing a job application."
inverse: false
- id: "delg_4"
text: "Writing a brief business meeting summary."
inverse: false
- id: "delg_5"
text: "Writing a condolence card to a friend."
inverse: false
- id: "delg_6"
text: "Writing a social media post."
inverse: false
- id: "delg_7"
text: "Writing a personal letter to a friend or relative."
inverse: false
- id: "delg_8"
text: "Writing a birthday invitation card to friends."
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 4]
format: "Multiple Choice (Preference Scale)"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = Full AI automation, 2 = AI leads and the human assists, 3 = Human leads and AI assists, 4 = No AI assistance"
output: "preferred_level_of_delegation"
reference: "self"
@@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
questionnaire: "reason_for_not_using_ai"
scales:
- name: "reason_for_not_using_ai"
label: "Reasons for Not Currently Using AI Systems"
items:
- id: "reason_why_noUser_1_1"
label: "lack_knowledge"
text: "I lack knowledge about how to use AI systems effectively."
- id: "reason_why_noUser_1_2"
label: "privacy_concerns"
text: "I am concerned about the privacy and security of using AI."
- id: "reason_why_noUser_1_3"
label: "no_use_case"
text: "I haven't found a clear need or use case for AI in my daily tasks."
- id: "reason_why_noUser_1_4"
label: "cost_barrier"
text: "The cost of AI systems is a barrier for me."
- id: "reason_why_noUser_1_5"
label: "reliability_concerns"
text: "I am unsure about the reliability or accuracy of AI systems."
- id: "reason_why_noUser_1_6"
label: "prefer_traditional"
text: "I prefer traditional methods and am hesitant to adopt new technology."
- id: "reason_why_noUser_1_7"
label: "waiting_maturity"
text: "I am waiting for AI technology to become more mature and widely adopted."
- id: "reason_why_noUser_1_8"
label: "no_resources"
text: "I don't have access to the necessary resources to use AI."
- id: "reason_why_noUser_1_9"
label: "ethical_concerns"
text: "I am concerned about the ethical implications of using AI."
- id: "reason_why_noUser_1_10"
label: "no_time"
text: "I haven't had the time to learn about or explore AI systems."
- id: "reason_why_noUser_1_11"
label: "dislike_ai"
text: "I dont like AI."
- id: "reason_why_noUser_1_12"
label: "other"
text: "Other reason (please name)."
open_ended_id: "reason_why_noUser_1_12_TEXT"
score_range: [1, 2]
format: "Multiple Selection"
calculation: "multiple_selection"
response_options:
"1": "True"
"2": "False"
output: "reason_for_not_using_ai"
reference: "self"
- name: "strong_reason_for_not_using_ai"
label: "Strength of Each Reason for Not Currently Using AI Systems (is this a strong reason for you?)"
items:
- id: "reason_why_noUser_2_1"
label: "strong_reason_lack_knowledge"
text: "Lack of knowledge about how to use AI systems effectively."
- id: "reason_why_noUser_2_2"
label: "strong_reason_privacy_concerns"
text: "Concerns about the privacy and security of using AI."
- id: "reason_why_noUser_2_3"
label: "strong_reason_no_use_case"
text: "Not having found a clear need or use case for AI in daily tasks."
- id: "reason_why_noUser_2_4"
label: "strong_reason_cost_barrier"
text: "The cost of AI systems being a barrier."
- id: "reason_why_noUser_2_5"
label: "strong_reason_reliability_concerns"
text: "Uncertainty about the reliability or accuracy of AI systems."
- id: "reason_why_noUser_2_6"
label: "strong_reason_prefer_traditional"
text: "Preference for traditional methods and hesitation to adopt new technology."
- id: "reason_why_noUser_2_7"
label: "strong_reason_waiting_maturity"
text: "Waiting for AI technology to become more mature and widely adopted."
- id: "reason_why_noUser_2_8"
label: "strong_reason_no_resources"
text: "Lack of access to the necessary resources to use AI."
- id: "reason_why_noUser_2_9"
label: "strong_reason_ethical_concerns"
text: "Concerns about the ethical implications of using AI."
- id: "reason_why_noUser_2_10"
label: "strong_reason_no_time"
text: "Not having had the time to learn about or explore AI systems."
- id: "reason_why_noUser_2_11"
label: "strong_reason_dislike_ai"
text: "Disliking AI."
- id: "reason_why_noUser_2_12"
label: "strong_reason_other"
text: "Other reason (please name)."
open_ended_id: "reason_why_noUser_2_12_TEXT"
score_range: [1, 2]
format: "Multiple Selection"
calculation: "multiple_selection"
response_options:
"1": "True"
"2": "False"
output: "strong_reason_for_not_using_ai"
reference: "self"
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
questionnaire: "risk_opportunity_perception"
scales:
- name: "risk_opportunity_perception"
label: "Perceived Risks and Opportunities of AI"
items:
- id: "rop_1"
text: "How concerned, if at all, are you when you think about AI?"
inverse: false
- id: "rop_2"
text: "How pessimistic, if at all, are you when you imagine the future use of AI?"
inverse: false
- id: "rop_3"
text: "How likely would AI negatively influence your life?"
inverse: false
- id: "rop_4"
text: "How likely would you suffer from the implementation of AI into everyday life?"
inverse: false
- id: "rop_5"
text: " How confident, if at all, do you feel when you think about the potential of AI?"
inverse: false
- id: "rop_6"
text: "How optimistic, if at all, are you when you imagine the future use of AI?"
inverse: false
- id: "rop_7"
text: "How likely would AI positively influence your life?"
inverse: false
- id: "rop_8"
text: "How likely would you benefit from the implementation of AI into everyday life?"
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 5]
format: "bipolar"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = not at all, 5 = extremely"
output: "risk_opportunity_score"
reference: "Adapted from Walpole & Wilson, 2021; Schwesig et al., 2023"
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
questionnaire: "security_concerns"
scales:
- name: "security_concerns_no_user"
label: "Security and Privacy Concerns About AI Among Non-Users"
items:
- id: "sec_concern_noUser_1"
text: "I worry that AI systems leave my personal information vulnerable."
inverse: false
- id: "sec_concern_noUser_2"
text: "I worry that using AI in daily applications makes it easier for my data to be misused."
inverse: false
- id: "sec_concern_noUser_3"
text: "I feel that AI lacks transparency about how it collects and processes my information."
inverse: false
- id: "sec_concern_noUser_4"
text: "I believe that companies using AI to analyze data put my privacy at risk."
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 7]
format: "Likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = Strongly disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Somewhat disagree, 4 = Neither disagree nor agree, 5 = Somewhat agree, 6 = Agree, 7 = Strongly agree"
output: "security_concerns_no_user"
reference: "self"
+89
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
questionnaire: "self_efficacy"
scales:
- name: "self_efficacy_without_ai_creativity"
label: "Creativity Self-Efficacy Without Considering AI Assistance"
items:
- id: "self_effcy_1"
text: "Regarding my creativity: I have confidence in my ability to generate novel and useful ideas."
inverse: false
- id: "self_effcy_2"
text: "Regarding my creativity: I am confident that my creative performance in a given task is good."
inverse: false
- id: "self_effcy_3"
text: "Regarding my creativity: I have a good knowledge base and creative strategy."
inverse: false
- id: "self_effcy_4"
text: "Regarding my creativity: I know that my creative abilities are good."
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 5]
format: "Likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = Strongly disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly agree"
output: "self_efficacy_without_ai_creativity"
reference: "PuenteDíaz, R., & CavazosArroyo, J. (2022)"
- name: "self_efficacy_without_ai_problem_solving"
label: "Problem-Solving Self-Efficacy Without Considering AI Assistance"
items:
- id: "self_effcy_5"
text: "Regarding my problem-solving skills: I feel capable of coping with my problems."
inverse: false
- id: "self_effcy_6"
text: "Regarding my problem-solving skills: Typically, my problems with any given task are not too big or hard for me to solve."
inverse: false
- id: "self_effcy_7"
text: "Regarding my problem-solving skills: Most of my plans for solving my problems on a given task are ones that would really work."
inverse: false
- id: "self_effcy_8"
text: "Regarding my problem-solving skills: I can typically handle my problems in any given task; they are not beyond me."
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 5]
format: "Likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = Strongly disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly agree"
output: "self_efficacy_without_ai_problem_solving"
reference: "Heppner et al., 2001"
- name: "self_efficacy_with_ai_creativity"
label: "Creativity self-efficacy with AI"
items:
- id: "self_effcy_wAI_1"
text: "Regarding my creativity: I have confidence in my ability to generate novel and useful ideas."
inverse: false
- id: "self_effcy_wAI_2"
text: "Regarding my creativity: I am confident that my creative performance in a given task is good."
inverse: false
- id: "self_effcy_wAI_3"
text: "Regarding my creativity: I have a good knowledge base and creative strategy."
inverse: false
- id: "self_effcy_wAI_4"
text: "Regarding my creativity: I know that my creative abilities are good."
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 5]
format: "Likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = Strongly disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly agree"
output: "self_efficacy_with_ai_creativity"
reference: "Puente-Diaz & Cavazos-Arroyo, 2022"
- name: "self_efficacy_with_ai_problem_solving"
label: "Problem solving self-efficacy with AI"
items:
- id: "self_effcy_wAI_5"
text: "Regarding my problem-solving skills: I feel capable of coping with my problems."
inverse: false
- id: "self_effcy_wAI_6"
text: "Regarding my creativity: I am confident that my creative performance in a given task is good."
inverse: false
- id: "self_effcy_wAI_7"
text: "Regarding my creativity: I have a good knowledge base and creative strategy."
inverse: false
- id: "self_effcy_wAI_8"
text: "Regarding my creativity: I know that my creative abilities are good."
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 5]
format: "Likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = Strongly disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly agree"
output: "self_efficacy_with_ai_problem_solving"
reference: "Heppner et al., 2001"
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
questionnaire: "social_presence"
scales:
- name: "social_presence_sense_favorite_ai"
label: "Social presence of favorite AI system (humanness)"
items:
- id: "social_pres_User_fav_1"
text: "There is a sense of human contact in the interaction."
inverse: false
- id: "social_pres_User_fav_2"
text: "There is a sense of personalness in the interaction."
inverse: false
- id: "social_pres_User_fav_3"
text: "There is a feeling of sociability in the interaction."
inverse: false
- id: "social_pres_User_fav_4"
text: "There is a feeling of human warmth in the interaction."
inverse: false
- id: "social_pres_User_fav_5"
text: "There is a feeling of human sensitivity in the interaction."
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 7]
format: "likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = Strongly disagree, 7 = Strongly agree"
output: "social_presence_sense_favorite_ai"
reference: "Gefen & Straub (2004)"
retain_single_items: true
- name: "social_presence_being_favorite_ai"
label: "Social presence of favorite AI system (intelligence)"
items:
- id: "social_pres2_fav_1"
text: "...how much do you feel you are interacting with an intelligent being?"
inverse: false
- id: "social_pres2_fav_2"
text: "...how much do you feel you are in the company of an intelligent being?"
inverse: false
- id: "social_pres2_fav_3"
text: "...how much do you feel an intelligent being is responding to you?"
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 7]
format: "likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = Strongly disagree, 7 = Strongly agree"
output: "social_presence_being_favorite_ai"
reference: "Lee, K. M., et al. (2006)"
+81
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
questionnaire: "task_types"
scales:
- name: "task_types_general"
label: "General Purposes for Using AI Systems"
items:
- id: "tsk_typs_1"
label: "writing"
text: "Writing"
- id: "tsk_typs_2"
label: "content_creation"
text: "Content Creation (excluding writing)"
- id: "tsk_typs_3"
label: "creative_idea"
text: "Creative Idea Exploration"
- id: "tsk_typs_4"
label: "info_search"
text: "Information Search"
- id: "tsk_typs_5"
label: "advice"
text: "Advice and Recommendation"
- id: "tsk_typs_6"
label: "learning"
text: "Explanations and Learning"
- id: "tsk_typs_7"
label: "analysis"
text: "Analysis and Processing"
- id: "tsk_typs_8"
label: "automation"
text: "Automation and Productivity"
- id: "tsk_typs_9"
label: "other"
text: "Other"
open_ended_id: "tsk_typs_9_TEXT"
score_range: [0, 1]
format: "Multiple Selection"
calculation: "multiple_selection"
response_options:
"1": "Selected"
"0": "Not Selected"
output: "task_types_general"
reference: "self"
- name: "task_types_favorite_ai"
label: "Types of Tasks for Which Favorite AI Is Used"
items:
- id: "tsk_typs_User_fav_1"
label: "writing"
text: "Writing"
- id: "tsk_typs_User_fav_2"
label: "content_creation"
text: "Content Creation (excluding writing)"
- id: "tsk_typs_User_fav_3"
label: "creative_idea"
text: "Creative Idea Exploration"
- id: "tsk_typs_User_fav_4"
label: "info_search"
text: "Information Search"
- id: "tsk_typs_User_fav_5"
label: "advice"
text: "Advice and Recommendation"
- id: "tsk_typs_User_fav_6"
label: "learning"
text: "Explanations and Learning"
- id: "tsk_typs_User_fav_7"
label: "analysis"
text: "Analysis and Processing"
- id: "tsk_typs_User_fav_8"
label: "automation"
text: "Automation and Productivity"
- id: "tsk_typs_User_fav_9"
label: "other"
text: "Other"
open_ended_id: "tsk_typs_User_fav_9_TEXT"
score_range: [0, 1]
format: "Multiple Selection"
calculation: "multiple_selection"
response_options:
"1": "Selected"
"0": "Not Selected"
output: "task_types_favorite_ai"
reference: "self"
+36
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
questionnaire: "trust"
scales:
- name: "trust_favorite_ai"
label: "Trust in favorite AI system"
items:
- id: "trust_User_fav_1"
text: "I am confident in [favorite AI]. I feel that it works well."
inverse: false
- id: "trust_User_fav_2"
text: "The outputs of [favorite AI] are very predictable."
inverse: false
- id: "trust_User_fav_3"
text: "[favorite AI] is very reliable. I can count on it to be correct all the time."
inverse: false
- id: "trust_User_fav_4"
text: "I feel safe that when I rely on [favorite AI] I will get the right answers."
inverse: false
- id: "trust_User_fav_5"
text: "[favorite AI] is efficient in that it works very quickly."
inverse: false
- id: "trust_User_fav_6"
text: "[favorite AI] can perform the task better than a novice human user."
inverse: false
- id: "trust_User_fav_7"
text: "I like using [favorite AI] for decision making."
inverse: false
- id: "trust_User_fav_8"
text: "I trust [favorite AI]"
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 5]
format: "Likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree"
output: "trust_favorite_ai"
reference: "Perrig, S. A., Scharowski, N., & Brühlmann, F. (2023)"
retain_single_items: true
+39
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
questionnaire: "trust"
scales:
- name: "trust_competence"
label: "Trust in favorite AI system"
items:
- id: "trust_User_fav_1"
text: "I am confident in [favorite AI]. I feel that it works well."
inverse: false
- id: "trust_User_fav_5"
text: "[favorite AI] is efficient in that it works very quickly."
inverse: false
- id: "trust_User_fav_6"
text: "[favorite AI] can perform the task better than a novice human user."
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 5]
format: "Likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree"
output: "trust_competence"
reference: "Perrig, S. A., Scharowski, N., & Brühlmann, F. (2023), split in 2 parts"
- name: "trust_dependability"
label: "Trust in favorite AI system"
items:
- id: "trust_User_fav_3"
text: "[favorite AI] is very reliable. I can count on it to be correct all the time."
inverse: false
- id: "trust_User_fav_4"
text: "I feel safe that when I rely on [favorite AI] I will get the right answers."
inverse: false
- id: "trust_User_fav_8"
text: "I trust [favorite AI]"
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 5]
format: "Likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree"
output: "trust_dependability"
reference: "Perrig, S. A., Scharowski, N., & Brühlmann, F. (2023), split in 2 parts"
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
questionnaire: "us_voting_and_mood"
scales:
- name: "voting_decision"
label: "US Presidential Vote (Voluntary)"
items:
- id: "US_voting"
text: "Due to the current events we are interested in your vote, your answer is voluntary!"
calculation: "categorical"
response_options:
"1": "I voted for Trump"
"2": "I voted for Harris"
"3": "I did not vote!"
output: "voting_decision"
reference: "self"
- name: "voting_mood"
label: "Self-Reported Mood during the US voting"
items:
- id: "mood_1"
text: "Please indicate the mood you had while completing the questionnaire on a scale from 1 to 7. 1 = Very negative 7 = Very positive - My mood is ..."
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 7]
format: "Likert"
calculation: "response"
response_options: "1 = Very negative, 7 = Very positive"
output: "voting_mood"
reference: "self"
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
questionnaire: "usage_and_experience"
scales:
- name: "user"
label: "User of a language-based AI system"
items:
- id: "use"
text: "Are you currently using language-based AI systems?"
format: "Boolean"
calculation: "boolean"
response_options:
"1": true
"2": false
output: "user"
reference: "self"
- name: "open_to_use"
label: "Openness to Using AI Systems in the Future"
items:
- id: "open_to_use"
text: "Are you open to use or plan to use language-based AI systems in the next couple of months?"
inverse: false
calculation: "boolean"
response_options:
"1": true
"2": false
output: "open_to_use"
reference: "self"
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
questionnaire: "usage_frequency"
scales:
- name: "general_ai_usage_frequency"
label: "General usage frequency of AI systems"
items:
- id: "use_freq_User"
text: "General usage frequency of AI systems"
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 7]
format: "bipolar"
calculation: "response"
response_options: "1 = never, 7 = several times a day"
output: "general_ai_usage_frequency"
reference: "self"
- name: "favorite_ai_usage_frequency"
label: "Usage frequency of favorite AI tool"
items:
- id: "use_freq_User_fav"
text: "Usage frequency of favorite AI tool"
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 7]
format: "bipolar"
calculation: "response"
response_options: "1 = never, 7 = several times a day"
output: "favorite_ai_usage_frequency"
reference: "self"
+27
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
questionnaire: "usefulness"
scales:
- name: "usefulness_favorite_ai"
label: "Perceived Usefulness of Favorite AI"
items:
- id: "usefulnss_User_fav_1"
text: "How useful is (piped fav AI) for assisting you with this/these task(s)?"
inverse: false
score_range: [0, 100]
format: "slider"
calculation: "response"
response_options: "0 = Not useful at all, 100 = Extremely useful"
output: "usefulness_favorite_ai"
reference: "self"
- name: "usefulness_no_user"
label: "Perceived Usefulness of AI Systems"
items:
- id: "usefulnss_noUser_1"
text: "How useful do you perceive AI systems?"
inverse: false
score_range: [0, 100]
format: "slider"
calculation: "response"
response_options: "0 = Not useful at all, 100 = Extremely useful"
output: "usefulness_no_user"
reference: "self"
@@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
questionnaire: "willingness_to_delegate"
scales:
- name: "willingness_to_delegate"
label: "Willingness to Delegate Tasks to AI on Your Behalf"
items:
- id: "delg_behalf_1"
text: "Post public updates on social media for you."
inverse: false
- id: "delg_behalf_2"
text: "Reply to generic messages (e.g., appointment confirmations)."
inverse: false
- id: "delg_behalf_3"
text: "Reply to private messages from friends or family."
inverse: false
- id: "delg_behalf_4"
text: "Choose topics or articles you share on social media."
inverse: false
- id: "delg_behalf_5"
text: "Recommend potential dating partners."
inverse: false
- id: "delg_behalf_6"
text: "Start conversations with potential dating partners."
inverse: false
- id: "delg_behalf_7"
text: "Make final choices about whom you date."
inverse: false
- id: "delg_behalf_8"
text: "Schedule medical appointments for you."
inverse: false
- id: "delg_behalf_9"
text: "Choose which doctor or specialist you should see."
inverse: false
- id: "delg_behalf_10"
text: "Summarize your health information for you."
inverse: false
- id: "delg_behalf_11"
text: "Provide you with recommendations on treating minor health issues."
inverse: false
- id: "delg_behalf_12"
text: "Decide whether you should seek medical care for a symptom."
inverse: false
- id: "delg_behalf_13"
text: "Choose which treatment option you should follow for a diagnosed condition."
inverse: false
- id: "delg_behalf_14"
text: "Make emergency medical decisions for you if you are unable to do so."
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 6]
format: "Likert"
calculation: "mean"
response_options: "1 = Definitely not, 2 = Probably not, 3 = Not sure, 4 = Probably yes, 5 = Definitely yes, 6 = Not applicable to me"
missing_response_option: ["6"]
output: "willingness_to_delegate"
reference: "self"
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
questionnaire: "willingness_to_delegate_change"
scales:
- name: "willingness_to_delegate_change"
label: "Perceived Change in Willingness to Delegate Tasks to AI"
items:
- id: "perc_chng_willg_delg"
text: "Compared to when this study started, how has your willingness to delegate tasks to AI changed?"
score_range: [1, 5]
format: "Multiple Choice"
calculation: "response"
response_options: "1 = Definitely not, 2 = Probably not, 3 = Not sure, 4 = Probably yes, 5 = Definitely yes"
output: "willingness_to_delegate_change"
reference: "self"
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
questionnaire: "willingness_to_delegate_future"
scales:
- name: "willingness_to_delegate_future"
label: "Future Willingness to Delegate More Tasks to AI"
items:
- id: "delg_future"
text: "In the future, do you think you will let AI do more and more tasks for you?"
inverse: false
score_range: [1, 5]
format: "Multiple Choice"
calculation: "response"
response_options: "1 = Definitely not, 2 = Probably not, 3 = Not sure, 4 = Probably yes, 5 = Definitely yes"
output: "willingness_to_delegate_future"
reference: "self"